Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5V Turbo vs MiniMax M2.1

GLM 5V Turbo leads MiniMax M2.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 23.5 to 20.9, and MiniMax M2.1 costs 3.3x less per output token ($1.20 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 14 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
9
MiniMax M2.1MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.20
5
vs boards won of 14 shared

GLM 5V Turbo or MiniMax M2.1: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 5V Turbo for work measured by GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
14
GLM 5V Turbo only
51
MiniMax M2.1 only
20
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked, MiniMax M2.1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 13.2 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: GLM 5V Turbo 98.5% against MiniMax M2.1 85.4%, 13.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 against MiniMax M2.1 $1.20 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
Context window
GLM 5V Turbo takes 203K tokens, MiniMax M2.1 205K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5V TurboBarsMiniMax M2.1Ties
Coding10
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning02
Web design52
General11
All shared boards95
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboMiniMax M2.1Leader
LMArena WebDev1402Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured81.8%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured74.8%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured81.0%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%28.8%GLM 5V Turbo
Terminal-BenchNot measured36.6%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured623.8Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
LMArena Text: coding1466Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1460Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: React1386Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1356Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1425Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboMiniMax M2.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index23.520.9GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboMiniMax M2.1Leader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1124Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1149Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1134Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1267Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games957Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building games1102Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1060Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1126Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%85.4%GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboMiniMax M2.1Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured78.5%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%83.0%MiniMax M2.1
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.1%23.2%MiniMax M2.1
LMArena Text: hard prompts1443Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: expert1453Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1456Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1286Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: homework1273Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboMiniMax M2.1Leader
AIMENot measured77.9%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured89.0%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured87.8%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured82.7Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.7%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
LMArena Text: math1442Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1447Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboMiniMax M2.1Leader
MMLU ProNot measured87.0%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured75.5%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured55.8%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured58.9%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured66.3%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured91.2%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured34.1%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured87.5%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
LMArena Text: science1448Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1433Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1436Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1435Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index52
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboMiniMax M2.1Leader
Design Arena: websites12301201GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: UI components12101220MiniMax M2.1
Design Arena: game dev12181134GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: data viz12021206MiniMax M2.1
Design Arena: 3D12081164GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: all code categories12271190GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: SVG11501131GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: ASCII art1116Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
General benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboMiniMax M2.1Leader
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured80.8%Only MiniMax M2.1 measured
IFBench61.1%69.9%MiniMax M2.1
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)70.3%67.7%GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text1437Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1423Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1417Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: English1454Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: non-English1420Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1491Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: German1422Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Korean1397Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: French1443Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1452Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Russian1432Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Polish1432Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1431Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1438Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1420Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1407Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: English1274Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1329Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1270Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: humor1268Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1241Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1252Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Document1416Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and MiniMax M2.1
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboMiniMax M2.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.1$0.0009Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
MiniMax M2.1$0.019Fits in one request

MiniMax M2.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
MiniMax M2.1$0.072Exceeds the context window

MiniMax M2.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5V Turbo and MiniMax M2.1
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5V TurboMiniMax M2.1
MakerZ.aiMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 1, 2026December 23, 2025
Context window203K205K
Input $/Mtok$1.20$0.30
Output $/Mtok$4.00$1.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.59
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5V Turbo better than MiniMax M2.1 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 5V Turbo for work measured by GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5V Turbo or MiniMax M2.1?

GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; MiniMax M2.1 costs $0.30 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M2.1 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5V Turbo or MiniMax M2.1?

MiniMax M2.1, with 205K tokens against 203K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5V Turbo vs MiniMax M2.1 comparison based on?

14 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 5V Turbo's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and MiniMax M2.1's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next