Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5V Turbo vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Kimi K2.7 Code leads GLM 5V Turbo on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 25.8 to 23.5, at about the same output price ($4.00 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 27 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
2
Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI
Coding
53.4
Overall
56.7
Output $/M
$4.00
25
vs boards won of 27 shared

GLM 5V Turbo or Kimi K2.7 Code: which to pick

Only Kimi K2.7 Code has a coding score, 53.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 5V Turbo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 5V Turbo for work measured by Design Arena: agents building Android apps or τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.

Shared results
27
GLM 5V Turbo only
38
Kimi K2.7 Code only
24
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked, Kimi K2.7 Code 53.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 13.5 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: agents building Godot games: GLM 5V Turbo 957 against Kimi K2.7 Code 1147, 23.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Both cost $4.00 per million output tokens.
Context window
GLM 5V Turbo takes 203K tokens, Kimi K2.7 Code 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5V TurboBarsKimi K2.7 CodeTies
Coding05
Intelligence01
Agentic work27
Reasoning02
Web design08
General02
All shared boards225
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
LMArena WebDev14021474Kimi K2.7 Code
AA Coding IndexNot measured60.8Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured78.2%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.2%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured25.4%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured50.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SciCodeNot measured47.8%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%44.7%Kimi K2.7 Code
FrontierCodeNot measured30.1%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
WeirdMLNot measured54.1%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
ALE-BenchNot measured886.2Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena Text: coding1466Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1460Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: React13861475Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena WebDev: HTML13561451Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena WebDev: from an image14251513Kimi K2.7 Code
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
AA Intelligence Index23.525.8Kimi K2.7 Code
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured150.1Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index27
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured21.0Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps11241176Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps11491175Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps11341142Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: agents building Android apps12671137GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: agents building Godot games9571147Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: agents building games11021130Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: HTML slides10601140Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides11261128Kimi K2.7 Code
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%90.1%GLM 5V Turbo
APEX-AgentsNot measured37.6%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$5,083Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%89.6%Kimi K2.7 Code
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.1%35.0%Kimi K2.7 Code
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured87.9%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SimpleBenchNot measured57.9%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured14.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1443Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: expert1453Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1456Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1286Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: homework1273Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured95.6%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured54.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured12.2%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena Text: math1442Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1447Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured36.5%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena Text: science1448Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1433Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1436Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1435Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
Design Arena: websites12301264Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: UI components12101255Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: game dev12181219Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: data viz12021227Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: 3D12081240Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: all code categories12271252Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: SVG11501176Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: ASCII art11161196Kimi K2.7 Code
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
IFBench61.1%63.1%Kimi K2.7 Code
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)70.3%79.3%Kimi K2.7 Code
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured48.8%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena Text1437Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1423Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1417Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: English1454Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: non-English1420Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1491Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: German1422Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Korean1397Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: French1443Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1452Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Russian1432Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Polish1432Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1431Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1438Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1420Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1407Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: English1274Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1329Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1270Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: humor1268Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1241Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1252Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Document1416Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
Kimi K2.7 Code$0.0029Fits in one request

Kimi K2.7 Code costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
Kimi K2.7 Code$0.059Fits in one request

Kimi K2.7 Code costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
Kimi K2.7 Code$0.230Fits in one request

Kimi K2.7 Code costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5V Turbo and Kimi K2.7 Code
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5V TurboMoonshotAI Kimi K2.7 Code
MakerZ.aiMoonshot AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 1, 2026June 12, 2026
Context window203K262K
Input $/Mtok$1.20$0.95
Output $/Mtok$4.00$4.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked53.4
Independent measurements behind it14
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.35
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5V Turbo better than Kimi K2.7 Code for coding?

Only Kimi K2.7 Code has a coding score, 53.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 5V Turbo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 5V Turbo for work measured by Design Arena: agents building Android apps or τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5V Turbo or Kimi K2.7 Code?

GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code costs $0.95 and $4.00. Cost per solved task is known for Kimi K2.7 Code only.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5V Turbo or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code, with 262K tokens against 203K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5V Turbo vs Kimi K2.7 Code comparison based on?

27 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 5V Turbo's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Kimi K2.7 Code's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next