Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5V Turbo vs gpt-oss-120b

GLM 5V Turbo leads gpt-oss-120b on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 23.5 to 11.6, and gpt-oss-120b costs 8.0x less per output token ($0.50 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 40 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
38
gpt-oss-120bOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
50.0
Output $/M
$0.50
2
vs boards won of 40 shared

GLM 5V Turbo or gpt-oss-120b: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 5V Turbo for a larger context window (203K against 131K tokens) and work measured by Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) or IFBench, where it leads.

Shared results
40
GLM 5V Turbo only
25
gpt-oss-120b only
41
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked, gpt-oss-120b not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 32.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: 3D: GLM 5V Turbo 1208 against gpt-oss-120b 901, 38.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 against gpt-oss-120b $0.50 per million output tokens, 8.0x apart.
Context window
GLM 5V Turbo takes 203K tokens, gpt-oss-120b 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5V TurboBarsgpt-oss-120bTies
Coding30
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning41
Math20
Knowledge40
Web design60
General171
All shared boards382
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index30
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and gpt-oss-120b
BenchmarkGLM 5V Turbogpt-oss-120bLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured41.8%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured26.0%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
LMArena WebDev1402Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured30.4Only gpt-oss-120b measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.2%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured33.6%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured87.8%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
SciCodeNot measured34.0%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%23.5%GLM 5V Turbo
Terminal-BenchNot measured18.7%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
WeirdMLNot measured48.2%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
ALE-BenchNot measured575.6Only gpt-oss-120b measured
LMArena Text: coding14661379GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: software and IT14601387GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena WebDev: React1386Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1356Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1425Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
SciCodeNot measured7.7%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and gpt-oss-120b
BenchmarkGLM 5V Turbogpt-oss-120bLeader
AA Intelligence Index23.511.6GLM 5V Turbo
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured139.8Only gpt-oss-120b measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and gpt-oss-120b
BenchmarkGLM 5V Turbogpt-oss-120bLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured3.7Only gpt-oss-120b measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1124Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1149Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1134Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1267Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games957Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building games1102Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1070Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1127Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%65.8%GLM 5V Turbo
APEX-AgentsNot measured4.4%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
METR time horizonsNot measured56.6%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured-$22Only gpt-oss-120b measured
BrowseComp-PlusNot measured67.0%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index41
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and gpt-oss-120b
BenchmarkGLM 5V Turbogpt-oss-120bLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured78.5%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%78.2%GLM 5V Turbo
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.1%19.6%gpt-oss-120b
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured75.8%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
SimpleBenchNot measured22.1%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured2.0%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14431364GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: expert14531356GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14561368GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: diagrams1286Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: homework1273Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured58.6%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and gpt-oss-120b
BenchmarkGLM 5V Turbogpt-oss-120bLeader
AIMENot measured92.6%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured94.8%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured92.0%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
AA Math IndexNot measured93.4Only gpt-oss-120b measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured93.4%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured88.9%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
LMArena Text: math14421389GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: mathematical work14471386GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and gpt-oss-120b
BenchmarkGLM 5V Turbogpt-oss-120bLeader
MMLU ProNot measured79.2%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured75.9%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured48.8%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured58.2%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured71.6%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured91.4%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.8%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
LMArena Text: science14481382GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14331388GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: legal and government14361355GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: business and finance14351359GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and gpt-oss-120b
BenchmarkGLM 5V Turbogpt-oss-120bLeader
Design Arena: websites1230967GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: UI components1210924GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: game dev1218992GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: data viz1202987GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: 3D1208901GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: all code categories1228962GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: SVG1151Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1117Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index171
General benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and gpt-oss-120b
BenchmarkGLM 5V Turbogpt-oss-120bLeader
IFBench61.1%69.0%gpt-oss-120b
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)70.3%52.0%GLM 5V Turbo
DTBenchNot measured76.3%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
LMCANot measured22.1%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured44.4%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured77.1%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured25.0%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
LMArena Text14371366GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: instruction following14231318GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: creative writing14171274GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: English14541375GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: non-English14201351GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Chinese14911385GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: German14221353GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1331Only gpt-oss-120b measured
LMArena Text: Korean13971282GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: French14431370GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Spanish14521389GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Russian14321343GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Polish14321353GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: multi-turn14311340GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: longer queries14381319GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: writing and language14201306GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14071292GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: English1274Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1329Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1270Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: humor1268Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1241Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1252Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Document1416Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and gpt-oss-120b
BenchmarkGLM 5V Turbogpt-oss-120bLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
gpt-oss-120b$0.0003Fits in one request

gpt-oss-120b costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
gpt-oss-120b$0.0065Fits in one request

gpt-oss-120b costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
gpt-oss-120b$0.025Exceeds the context window

gpt-oss-120b costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5V Turbo and gpt-oss-120b
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5V TurboOpenAI gpt-oss-120b
MakerZ.aiOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 1, 2026August 5, 2025
Context window203K131K
Input $/Mtok$1.20$0.10
Output $/Mtok$4.00$0.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.51
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5V Turbo better than gpt-oss-120b for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 5V Turbo for a larger context window (203K against 131K tokens) and work measured by Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) or IFBench, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5V Turbo or gpt-oss-120b?

GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; gpt-oss-120b costs $0.10 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for gpt-oss-120b only.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5V Turbo or gpt-oss-120b?

GLM 5V Turbo, with 203K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5V Turbo vs gpt-oss-120b comparison based on?

40 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 5V Turbo's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and gpt-oss-120b's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next