LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5V Turbo vs GPT-4.1 Mini

Updated October 21, 2026. 50 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
28.8
Overall
23.5
Output $/M
$4.00
50
GPT-4.1 MiniOpenAI
Coding
28.5
Overall
10.2
Output $/M
$1.60
0
vs boards won of 50 shared

Decision reading

GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4.1 Mini are level for coding, 28.8 against 28.5 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide.

Pick GPT-4.1 Mini when output tokens cost 2.5x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 203K tokens. Pick GLM 5V Turbo when what matters is Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
50
GLM 5V Turbo only
15
GPT-4.1 Mini only
34
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5V Turbo 28.8 from 1 benchmark, GPT-4.1 Mini 28.5 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 45.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: 3D: GLM 5V Turbo 1209 against GPT-4.1 Mini 837, 46.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 against GPT-4.1 Mini $1.60 per million output tokens, 2.5x apart.
Context window
GLM 5V Turbo takes 203K tokens, GPT-4.1 Mini 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5V TurboBarsGPT-4.1 MiniTies
Coding30
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning70
Math20
Knowledge40
Web design60
General260
All shared boards500
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index30
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4.1 Mini
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4.1 MiniLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured32.4%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured23.9%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena WebDev1402Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured20.2Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured58.2%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured48.3%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%7.6%GLM 5V Turbo
WeirdMLNot measured37.6%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: coding14661367GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: software and IT14601360GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena WebDev: React1386Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1356Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1425Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4.1 Mini
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4.1 MiniLeader
AA Intelligence Index23.510.2GLM 5V Turbo
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured134.9Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4.1 Mini
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4.1 MiniLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1124Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1149Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1134Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1267Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games957Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building games1102Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1120Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1152Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%52.9%GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4.1 Mini
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4.1 MiniLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured67.9%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured70.5%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%66.4%GLM 5V Turbo
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.1%5.0%GLM 5V Turbo
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured65.8%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
ARC-AGINot measured3.5%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured0.0%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured1.0%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured7.0%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14431349GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: expert14531338GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14561362GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: diagrams12861182GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: homework12731214GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4.1 Mini
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4.1 MiniLeader
AIMENot measured49.4%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured88.0%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured87.8%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
AA Math IndexNot measured46.3Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured46.3%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured44.7%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured6.7%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MATH level 5Not measured87.3%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: math14421343GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: mathematical work14471347GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4.1 Mini
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4.1 MiniLeader
MMLU ProNot measured77.2%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured78.0%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured57.9%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured71.9%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured65.5%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured84.6%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.1%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured12.7%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: science14481328GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14331324GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: legal and government14361343GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: business and finance14351322GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4.1 Mini
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4.1 MiniLeader
Design Arena: websites1230997GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: UI components1213961GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: game dev12191071GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: data viz12021034GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: 3D1209837GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: all code categories1228994GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: SVG1151Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1118Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index260
General benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4.1 Mini
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4.1 MiniLeader
IFBench61.1%38.3%GLM 5V Turbo
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)70.3%44.0%GLM 5V Turbo
DTBenchNot measured68.8%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMCANot measured21.1%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured44.4%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text14371341GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: instruction following14231333GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: creative writing14171299GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision12641181GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: English14541356GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: non-English14201318GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Chinese14911329GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: German14221350GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1290Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Korean13971298GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: French14431358GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Spanish14521319GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Russian14321324GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Polish14321326GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: multi-turn14311354GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: longer queries14381344GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: writing and language14201319GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14071300GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: English12741191GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: Chinese13291186GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: reading text12701188GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: humor12681182GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: captioning12641174GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: recognizing things12411187GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: creative writing12521182GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Document1416Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4.1 Mini
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4.1 MiniLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
GPT-4.1 Mini$0.0012Fits in one request

GPT-4.1 Mini costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
GPT-4.1 Mini$0.025Fits in one request

GPT-4.1 Mini costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
GPT-4.1 Mini$0.096Fits in one request

GPT-4.1 Mini costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4.1 Mini
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5V TurboOpenAI GPT-4.1 Mini
MakerZ.aiOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 1, 2026April 14, 2025
Context window203K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.20$0.40
Output $/Mtok$4.00$1.60
Coding index28.828.5
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.818
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5V Turbo better than GPT-4.1 Mini for coding?

GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4.1 Mini are level for coding, 28.8 against 28.5 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide. Pick GPT-4.1 Mini when output tokens cost 2.5x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 203K tokens. Pick GLM 5V Turbo when what matters is Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5V Turbo or GPT-4.1 Mini?

GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; GPT-4.1 Mini costs $0.40 and $1.60. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-4.1 Mini only.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5V Turbo or GPT-4.1 Mini?

GPT-4.1 Mini, with 1.05M tokens against 203K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5V Turbo vs GPT-4.1 Mini comparison based on?

50 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GLM 5V Turbo's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-4.1 Mini's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next