GLM 5 vs GLM 5V Turbo
Updated October 21, 2026. 50 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Pick GLM 5 for coding: it scores 59.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 28.8 for GLM 5V Turbo.
Pick GLM 5V Turbo when what matters is LMArena Text: coding or Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 50
- GLM 5 only
- 25
- GLM 5V Turbo only
- 15
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, four public coding benchmarks
GLM 5
GLM 5 scores 59.7 against 28.8.
2 and 1 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
GLM 5
GLM 5 leads, 27.9 against 23.5.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only GLM 5 has a GPQA Diamond result, 83.3%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only GLM 5 has a AIME result, 91.7%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only GLM 5 has a MMLU Pro result, 86.0%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
GLM 5
GLM 5 leads, 1247 against 1230.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
GLM 5
GLM 5 takes 205K tokens against 203K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
GLM 5
GLM 5 $0.0026, GLM 5V Turbo $0.0032 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only GLM 5 has the number, $0.63.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- GLM 5 59.7 from 2 benchmarks, GLM 5V Turbo 28.8 from 1 benchmark.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 7.5 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Design Arena: agents building Godot games: GLM 5 1144 against GLM 5V Turbo 957, 23.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GLM 5 $3.20 against GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
- Context window
- GLM 5 takes 205K tokens, GLM 5V Turbo 203K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GLM 5 | Bars | GLM 5V Turbo | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 5 | 1 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 3 | 3 | ||
| Reasoning | 5 | 0 | ||
| Math | 1 | 1 | ||
| Knowledge | 3 | 1 | ||
| Web design | 8 | 0 | ||
| General | 18 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 44 | 6 |
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index51
| Benchmark | GLM 5 | GLM 5V Turbo | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 72.8% | Not measured | Only GLM 5 measured |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 69.7% | Not measured | Only GLM 5 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1435 | 1402 | GLM 5 |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 81.9% | Not measured | Only GLM 5 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 71.4% | Not measured | Only GLM 5 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 23.4% | Not measured | Only GLM 5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 43.2% | 32.6% | GLM 5 |
| Terminal-Bench | 52.4% | Not measured | Only GLM 5 measured |
| WeirdML | 48.2% | Not measured | Only GLM 5 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 765.6 | Not measured | Only GLM 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1461 | 1466 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1460 | 1460 | GLM 5 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1424 | 1386 | GLM 5 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1450 | 1356 | GLM 5 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | Not measured | 1425 | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | GLM 5 | GLM 5V Turbo | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 27.9 | 23.5 | GLM 5 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.8 | Not measured | Only GLM 5 measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index33
| Benchmark | GLM 5 | GLM 5V Turbo | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1124 | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1123 | 1149 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1136 | 1134 | GLM 5 |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | 1152 | 1267 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | 1144 | 957 | GLM 5 |
| Design Arena: agents building games | Not measured | 1102 | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | 1148 | 1120 | GLM 5 |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | Not measured | 1152 | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 98.2% | 98.5% | GLM 5V Turbo |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $4,432 | Not measured | Only GLM 5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
| Benchmark | GLM 5 | GLM 5V Turbo | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | Not measured | Only GLM 5 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 82.0% | 80.9% | GLM 5 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 29.3% | 17.1% | GLM 5 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 87.8% | Not measured | Only GLM 5 measured |
| ARC-AGI | 44.7% | Not measured | Only GLM 5 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | Not measured | Only GLM 5 measured |
| SimpleBench | 53.2% | Not measured | Only GLM 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1452 | 1443 | GLM 5 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1454 | 1453 | GLM 5 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1460 | 1456 | GLM 5 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1286 | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1273 | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
| Benchmark | GLM 5 | GLM 5V Turbo | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 91.7% | Not measured | Only GLM 5 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 80.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1440 | 1442 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1451 | 1447 | GLM 5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
| Benchmark | GLM 5 | GLM 5V Turbo | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 86.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 5 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 84.1% | Not measured | Only GLM 5 measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 52.5% | Not measured | Only GLM 5 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 62.9% | Not measured | Only GLM 5 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 70.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 5 measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 94.3% | Not measured | Only GLM 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1460 | 1448 | GLM 5 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1455 | 1433 | GLM 5 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1453 | 1436 | GLM 5 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1430 | 1435 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
| Benchmark | GLM 5 | GLM 5V Turbo | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1247 | 1230 | GLM 5 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1230 | 1213 | GLM 5 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1234 | 1219 | GLM 5 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1228 | 1202 | GLM 5 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1229 | 1209 | GLM 5 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1246 | 1228 | GLM 5 |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1168 | 1151 | GLM 5 |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1146 | 1118 | GLM 5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index180
| Benchmark | GLM 5 | GLM 5V Turbo | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 72.3% | 61.1% | GLM 5 |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 75.7% | 70.3% | GLM 5 |
| CL-bench | 18.7% | Not measured | Only GLM 5 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1446 | 1437 | GLM 5 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1428 | 1423 | GLM 5 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1438 | 1417 | GLM 5 |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1264 | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1458 | 1454 | GLM 5 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1430 | 1420 | GLM 5 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1511 | 1491 | GLM 5 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1447 | 1422 | GLM 5 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1416 | Not measured | Only GLM 5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1423 | 1397 | GLM 5 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1456 | 1443 | GLM 5 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1454 | 1452 | GLM 5 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1436 | 1432 | GLM 5 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1434 | 1432 | GLM 5 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1456 | 1431 | GLM 5 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1446 | 1438 | GLM 5 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1437 | 1420 | GLM 5 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1426 | 1407 | GLM 5 |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1274 | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1329 | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1270 | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1268 | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| LMArena Vision: captioning | Not measured | 1264 | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | Not measured | 1241 | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1252 | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| LMArena Document | Not measured | 1416 | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 5 | GLM 5V Turbo | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
GLM 5 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
GLM 5 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
GLM 5 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Z.ai GLM 5 | Z.ai GLM 5V Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Z.ai | Z.ai |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | February 11, 2026 | April 1, 2026 |
| Context window | 205K | 203K |
| Input $/Mtok | $1.00 | $1.20 |
| Output $/Mtok | $3.20 | $4.00 |
| Coding index | 59.7 | 28.8 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 2 | 1 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.63 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GLM 5 better than GLM 5V Turbo for coding?
Pick GLM 5 for coding: it scores 59.7 on the Vibe Coding Index against 28.8 for GLM 5V Turbo. Pick GLM 5V Turbo when what matters is LMArena Text: coding or Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, GLM 5 or GLM 5V Turbo?
GLM 5 costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 and $4.00. Cost per solved task is known for GLM 5 only.
Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5 or GLM 5V Turbo?
GLM 5, with 205K tokens against 203K.
How many benchmarks is the GLM 5 vs GLM 5V Turbo comparison based on?
50 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GLM 5's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and GLM 5V Turbo's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.