Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5 vs GLM 5.3 Prime

GLM 5 costs 2.8x less per output token than GLM 5.3 Prime ($3.20 vs $8.80 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GLM 5Z.ai
Coding
41.7
Overall
54.3
Output $/M
$3.20
GLM 5.3 PrimeZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$8.80
vs $3.20 vs $8.80 per 1M output tokens. GLM 5 is 2.8x cheaper.

GLM 5 or GLM 5.3 Prime: which to pick

Only GLM 5 has a coding score, 41.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 5.3 Prime has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 5.3 Prime for a larger context window (1M against 205K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. GLM 5 has results on SWE-bench Verified, SWE-bench Multilingual and LMArena WebDev; GLM 5.3 Prime has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5 41.7 from 3 benchmarks, GLM 5.3 Prime not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GLM 5 $3.20 against GLM 5.3 Prime $8.80 per million output tokens, 2.8x apart.
Context window
GLM 5 takes 205K tokens, GLM 5.3 Prime 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index14 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5 and GLM 5.3 Prime
BenchmarkGLM 5GLM 5.3 PrimeLeader
SWE-bench Verified72.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual69.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena WebDev1435Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)81.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)71.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)23.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)43.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
Terminal-Bench52.4%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
WeirdML48.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
ALE-Bench765.6Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text: coding1461Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1460Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1424Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1450Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5 and GLM 5.3 Prime
BenchmarkGLM 5GLM 5.3 PrimeLeader
AA Intelligence Index27.9Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index145.8Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5 and GLM 5.3 Prime
BenchmarkGLM 5GLM 5.3 PrimeLeader
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1123Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1136Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1146Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1144Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1148Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$4,432Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5 and GLM 5.3 Prime
BenchmarkGLM 5GLM 5.3 PrimeLeader
GPQA Diamond83.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)82.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)29.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)87.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
ARC-AGI44.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
ARC-AGI-24.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
SimpleBench53.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1452Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1454Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1460Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark75.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Math benchmarks for GLM 5 and GLM 5.3 Prime
BenchmarkGLM 5GLM 5.3 PrimeLeader
AIME91.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
OTIS Mock AIME80.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text: math1440Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1451Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5 and GLM 5.3 Prime
BenchmarkGLM 5GLM 5.3 PrimeLeader
MMLU Pro86.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.1%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)52.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)62.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)70.0%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)94.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text: science1460Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1455Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1453Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1430Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5 and GLM 5.3 Prime
BenchmarkGLM 5GLM 5.3 PrimeLeader
Design Arena: websites1247Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1230Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1234Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1228Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1229Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1246Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1168Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1147Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards measured
General benchmarks for GLM 5 and GLM 5.3 Prime
BenchmarkGLM 5GLM 5.3 PrimeLeader
IFBench72.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)75.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
CL-bench18.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text1446Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1428Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1438Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text: English1458Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1430Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1511Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text: German1447Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1416Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1423Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text: French1456Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1454Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1436Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1434Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1456Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1446Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1437Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1426Not measuredOnly GLM 5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5$0.0026Fits in one request
GLM 5.3 Prime$0.0072Fits in one request

GLM 5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5$0.060Fits in one request
GLM 5.3 Prime$0.166Fits in one request

GLM 5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5$0.232Exceeds the context window
GLM 5.3 Prime$0.648Fits in one request

GLM 5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5 and GLM 5.3 Prime
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5Z.ai GLM 5.3 Prime
MakerZ.aiZ.ai
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedFebruary 11, 2026September 23, 2026
Context window205K1M
Input $/Mtok$1.00$2.80
Output $/Mtok$3.20$8.80
Coding index41.7Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$0.63Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5 better than GLM 5.3 Prime for coding?

Only GLM 5 has a coding score, 41.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 5.3 Prime has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 5.3 Prime for a larger context window (1M against 205K tokens).

Which is cheaper, GLM 5 or GLM 5.3 Prime?

GLM 5 costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; GLM 5.3 Prime costs $2.80 and $8.80. Cost per solved task is known for GLM 5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5 or GLM 5.3 Prime?

GLM 5.3 Prime, with 1M tokens against 205K.

Has any benchmark tested both GLM 5 and GLM 5.3 Prime?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GLM 5 has results on SWE-bench Verified, SWE-bench Multilingual and LMArena WebDev; GLM 5.3 Prime has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next