GLM 5 Turbo vs GPT-4.1
GLM 5 Turbo leads GPT-4.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 26.6 to 12.7, and GLM 5 Turbo costs 2.0x less per output token ($4.00 vs $8.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 14 benchmarks have a result for both.
GLM 5 Turbo or GPT-4.1: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick GLM 5 Turbo for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($4.00 vs $8.00 per million).
- Shared results
- 14
- GLM 5 Turbo only
- 2
- GPT-4.1 only
- 78
- Like-for-like categories
- 6 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
GLM 5 Turbo
GLM 5 Turbo leads, 26.6 against 12.7.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only GPT-4.1 has a GPQA Diamond result, 65.4%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only GPT-4.1 has a AIME result, 39.6%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only GPT-4.1 has a MMLU Pro result, 80.5%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
GLM 5 Turbo
GLM 5 Turbo leads, 1262 against 1038.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-4.1
GPT-4.1 takes 1.05M tokens against 203K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
GLM 5 Turbo
GLM 5 Turbo $0.0032, GPT-4.1 $0.0060 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only GPT-4.1 has the number, $0.37.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- GLM 5 Turbo not benchmarked, GPT-4.1 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 51.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- τ²-Bench Telecom: GLM 5 Turbo 98.5% against GPT-4.1 47.1%, 51.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GLM 5 Turbo $4.00 against GPT-4.1 $8.00 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
- Context window
- GLM 5 Turbo takes 203K tokens, GPT-4.1 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GLM 5 Turbo | Bars | GPT-4.1 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 2 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 1 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 2 | 0 | ||
| Web design | 6 | 0 | ||
| General | 2 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 14 | 0 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
| Benchmark | GLM 5 Turbo | GPT-4.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider polyglot | Not measured | 52.4% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified | Not measured | 39.6% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal | Not measured | 31.1% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 54.7% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 45.7% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 33.3% | 13.6% | GLM 5 Turbo |
| WeirdML | Not measured | 39.0% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 634.0 | 558.1 | GLM 5 Turbo |
| LMArena Text: coding | Not measured | 1390 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | Not measured | 1391 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 4.6% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | GLM 5 Turbo | GPT-4.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 26.6 | 12.7 | GLM 5 Turbo |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 136.7 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | GLM 5 Turbo | GPT-4.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 98.5% | 47.1% | GLM 5 Turbo |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) | Not measured | 54.0% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| BrowseComp-Plus | Not measured | 36.4% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | GLM 5 Turbo | GPT-4.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 65.4% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 72.4% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 84.7% | 66.6% | GLM 5 Turbo |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 27.8% | 4.2% | GLM 5 Turbo |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 66.9% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| ARC-AGI | Not measured | 5.5% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | Not measured | 0.4% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| SimpleBench | Not measured | 27.0% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| Chess puzzles | Not measured | 3.0% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | Not measured | 1384 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | Not measured | 1364 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | Not measured | 1393 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1215 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1248 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | Not measured | 52.3% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 5 Turbo | GPT-4.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | Not measured | 39.6% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 87.2% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | Not measured | 87.7% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| AA Math Index | Not measured | 34.7 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 34.7% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 38.3% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 6.0% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| MATH level 5 | Not measured | 83.0% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | Not measured | 1369 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | Not measured | 1360 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 5 Turbo | GPT-4.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 80.5% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 83.1% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 69.9% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 63.0% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 75.1% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 65.9% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | Not measured | 91.2% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 80.6% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 31.1% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| GeoBench | Not measured | 72.0% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | Not measured | 1382 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | Not measured | 1379 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | Not measured | 1399 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | Not measured | 1369 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | Not measured | 45.8% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
| Benchmark | GLM 5 Turbo | GPT-4.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1262 | 1038 | GLM 5 Turbo |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1260 | 997 | GLM 5 Turbo |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1248 | 1079 | GLM 5 Turbo |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1264 | 1104 | GLM 5 Turbo |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1247 | 849 | GLM 5 Turbo |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1261 | 1025 | GLM 5 Turbo |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1205 | Not measured | Only GLM 5 Turbo measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1160 | Not measured | Only GLM 5 Turbo measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | GLM 5 Turbo | GPT-4.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 73.2% | 43.0% | GLM 5 Turbo |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 71.7% | 68.3% | GLM 5 Turbo |
| DTBench | Not measured | 68.3% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 25.6% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| Fiction.LiveBench | Not measured | 63.9% | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text | Not measured | 1383 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | Not measured | 1367 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | Not measured | 1363 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1210 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | Not measured | 1392 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | Not measured | 1370 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | Not measured | 1382 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: German | Not measured | 1381 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | Not measured | 1319 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | Not measured | 1338 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | Not measured | 1382 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | Not measured | 1376 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | Not measured | 1377 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | Not measured | 1389 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | Not measured | 1397 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | Not measured | 1385 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | Not measured | 1371 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | Not measured | 1365 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1209 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1226 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1218 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1196 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: captioning | Not measured | 1207 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | Not measured | 1208 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1210 | Only GPT-4.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 5 Turbo | GPT-4.1 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
GLM 5 Turbo costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
GLM 5 Turbo costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
GLM 5 Turbo costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Z.ai GLM 5 Turbo | OpenAI GPT-4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Z.ai | OpenAI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | March 15, 2026 | April 14, 2025 |
| Context window | 203K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $1.20 | $2.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $4.00 | $8.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.37 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GLM 5 Turbo better than GPT-4.1 for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 5 Turbo for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($4.00 vs $8.00 per million).
Which is cheaper, GLM 5 Turbo or GPT-4.1?
GLM 5 Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; GPT-4.1 costs $2.00 and $8.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-4.1 only.
Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5 Turbo or GPT-4.1?
GPT-4.1, with 1.05M tokens against 203K.
How many benchmarks is the GLM 5 Turbo vs GPT-4.1 comparison based on?
14 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 5 Turbo's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GPT-4.1's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.