GLM 4.5 vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs 1.2x less per output token than GLM 4.5 ($1.80 vs $2.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 8 benchmarks have a result for both.
GLM 4.5 or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20: which to pick
Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 4.5 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick GLM 4.5 for work measured by AIME, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 8
- GLM 4.5 only
- 53
- Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 only
- 17
- Like-for-like categories
- 4 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only GLM 4.5 has a AA Intelligence Index result, 12.8.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 leads, 87.4% against 72.2%.
Same board, both measured
Math
AIME
GLM 4.5
GLM 4.5 leads, 86.7% against 86.0%.
Same board, both measured
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 leads, 87.2% against 81.2%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only GLM 4.5 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1169.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 takes 1M tokens against 131K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
GLM 4.5 $0.0017, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 $0.0012 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has the number, $1.35.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- GLM 4.5 not benchmarked, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 39.5 from 2 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Reasoning, 15.2 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- LiveCodeBench (Vals AI): GLM 4.5 67.5% against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 85.3%, 17.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GLM 4.5 $2.20 against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 $1.80 per million output tokens, 1.2x apart.
- Context window
- GLM 4.5 takes 131K tokens, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 1M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GLM 4.5 | Bars | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 2 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 1 | ||
| Math | 1 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 4 | ||
| All shared boards | 1 | 7 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
| Benchmark | GLM 4.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 64.2% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 67.5% | 85.3% | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | Not measured | 71.2% | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 15.7% | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 73.8% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 22.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| WeirdML | 40.6% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 344.8 | 608.9 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1434 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1440 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 4.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 12.8 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | Not measured | 146.2 | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 4.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 43.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | $1 | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | GLM 4.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 72.2% | 87.4% | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | Not measured | 22.8% | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 78.2% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 13.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 84.8% | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| Chess puzzles | Not measured | 8.0% | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | Not measured | 17.0% | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1429 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1433 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1429 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.9% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | GLM 4.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 86.7% | 86.0% | GLM 4.5 |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | 94.0% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 90.8% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| AA Math Index | 73.7 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 73.7% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 86.7% | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1427 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1430 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | GLM 4.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 81.2% | 87.2% | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 75.6% | 85.1% | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 59.7% | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 61.0% | 65.3% | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 72.4% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 60.8% | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 90.0% | 95.2% | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 83.5% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | Not measured | 25.4% | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1444 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1455 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1438 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1420 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 4.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1169 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1141 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1144 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1159 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1170 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1164 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1095 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here | |||
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index25 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 4.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 30.4% | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| IFBench | 44.1% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 52.7% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| DTBench | Not measured | 80.5% | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 36.4% | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| Creative writing (Lech Mazur) | 73.4% | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| CL-bench | Not measured | 19.8% | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| CL-bench Life | Not measured | 12.4% | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1430 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1404 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1395 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1437 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1417 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1465 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: German | 1407 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1415 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1380 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1418 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1454 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1413 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1422 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1415 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1412 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1403 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1404 | Not measured | Only GLM 4.5 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 4.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Z.ai GLM 4.5 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Z.ai | Qwen |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | July 25, 2025 | April 27, 2026 |
| Context window | 131K | 1M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.60 | $0.30 |
| Output $/Mtok | $2.20 | $1.80 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 39.5 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 2 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $1.35 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GLM 4.5 better than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 for coding?
Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 has a coding score, 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 4.5 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 4.5 for work measured by AIME, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, GLM 4.5 or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?
GLM 4.5 costs $0.60 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs $0.30 and $1.80. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 only.
Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.5 or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20, with 1M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks is the GLM 4.5 vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 comparison based on?
8 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 4.5's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.