Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Mistral Large

Updated October 21, 2026. 29 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Gemma 4 26B A4BGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
16.7
Output $/M
$0.60
29
Mistral LargeMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
5.8
Output $/M
$6.00
0
vs boards won of 29 shared

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Gemma 4 26B A4B has the edge where output tokens cost 10.0x less, and where the context window is larger, 262K against 128K tokens.

Shared results
29
Gemma 4 26B A4B only
25
Mistral Large only
15
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemma 4 26B A4B not benchmarked, Mistral Large not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 35.6 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): Gemma 4 26B A4B 79.2% against Mistral Large 35.1%, 44.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemma 4 26B A4B $0.60 against Mistral Large $6.00 per million output tokens, 10.0x apart.
Context window
Gemma 4 26B A4B takes 262K tokens, Mistral Large 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemma 4 26B A4BBarsMistral LargeTies
Coding20
Intelligence20
Reasoning50
Math20
Knowledge40
General140
All shared boards290
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMistral LargeLeader
LMArena WebDev1360Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
AA Coding Index39.3Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured37.1%Only Mistral Large measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured17.8%Only Mistral Large measured
SciCode40.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)25.0%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
WeirdML35.2%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
ALE-Bench927.2Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: coding14461275Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: software and IT14541274Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena WebDev: React1351Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1362Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMistral LargeLeader
AA Intelligence Index16.75.8Gemma 4 26B A4B
Epoch Capabilities Index141.9122.1Gemma 4 26B A4B
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMistral LargeLeader
AA Agentic Index2.9Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
τ²-Bench Telecom43.6%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMistral LargeLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured47.7%Only Mistral Large measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.2%35.1%Gemma 4 26B A4B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)19.3%3.5%Gemma 4 26B A4B
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)73.2%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14381257Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: expert14471208Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14481268Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Vision: diagrams1264Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: homework1293Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMistral LargeLeader
AIMENot measured9.2%Only Mistral Large measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured74.4%Only Mistral Large measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured87.2%Only Mistral Large measured
OTIS Mock AIME82.2%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: math14701261Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: mathematical work14751257Gemma 4 26B A4B
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMistral LargeLeader
MMLU ProNot measured69.7%Only Mistral Large measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured63.8%Only Mistral Large measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured76.2%Only Mistral Large measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured51.5%Only Mistral Large measured
MMLUNot measured68.8%Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: science14461260Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14281255Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: legal and government14571275Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: business and finance14291238Gemma 4 26B A4B
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMistral LargeLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index140
General benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMistral LargeLeader
IFBench72.4%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)65.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
DTBench74.9%60.8%Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMCA29.7%Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text14341265Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: instruction following14201249Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: creative writing14001242Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Vision1260Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Text: English14441284Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: non-English14211235Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: Chinese14951239Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1242Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1170Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1202Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: French14601325Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: Spanish14151268Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: Russian14341252Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1157Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14411260Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: longer queries14271261Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: writing and language14051261Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14031230Gemma 4 26B A4B
LMArena Vision: English1256Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1312Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1268Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: humor1272Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1297Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1191Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1256Not measuredOnly Gemma 4 26B A4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mistral Large
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4BMistral LargeLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemma 4 26B A4B$0.0004Fits in one request
Mistral Large$0.0050Fits in one request

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemma 4 26B A4B$0.0093Fits in one request
Mistral Large$0.118Fits in one request

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemma 4 26B A4B$0.036Fits in one request
Mistral Large$0.460Exceeds the context window

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mistral Large
SpecificationGoogle Gemma 4 26B A4BMistral Large
MakerGoogleMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 3, 2026February 26, 2024
Context window262K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$2.00
Output $/Mtok$0.60$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B better than Mistral Large for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Gemma 4 26B A4B has the edge where output tokens cost 10.0x less, and where the context window is larger, 262K against 128K tokens.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Mistral Large?

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Mistral Large costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Mistral Large?

Gemma 4 26B A4B, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Mistral Large comparison based on?

29 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemma 4 26B A4B's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Mistral Large's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next