Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Gemma 3 4B vs Kimi K2 Thinking

Updated October 21, 2026. 12 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Gemma 3 4BGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
4.8
Output $/M
$0.075
0
Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AI
Coding
No data
Overall
22.0
Output $/M
$2.50
12
vs boards won of 12 shared

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Gemma 3 4B has the edge where output tokens cost 33.3x less, and where what matters is LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
12
Gemma 3 4B only
27
Kimi K2 Thinking only
18
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Gemma 3 4B not benchmarked, Kimi K2 Thinking not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 88.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Gemma 3 4B 5.0% against Kimi K2 Thinking 93.0%, 88.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Gemma 3 4B $0.075 against Kimi K2 Thinking $2.50 per million output tokens, 33.3x apart.
Context window
Gemma 3 4B takes 131K tokens, Kimi K2 Thinking 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGemma 3 4BBarsKimi K2 ThinkingTies
Coding02
Intelligence02
Agentic work01
Reasoning02
Math02
Knowledge01
General02
All shared boards012
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Gemma 3 4B and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BKimi K2 ThinkingLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured63.4%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
AA Coding Index2.7Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured63.1%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured60.2%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)11.2%85.3%Kimi K2 Thinking
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)0.8%31.1%Kimi K2 Thinking
Terminal-BenchNot measured35.7%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
WeirdMLNot measured42.8%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
ALE-BenchNot measured597.5Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LMArena Text: coding1230Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1269Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Gemma 3 4B and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BKimi K2 ThinkingLeader
AA Intelligence Index4.822.0Kimi K2 Thinking
Epoch Capabilities Index115.9145.8Kimi K2 Thinking
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Gemma 3 4B and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BKimi K2 ThinkingLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom5.0%93.0%Kimi K2 Thinking
METR time horizonsNot measured59.2%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Gemma 3 4B and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BKimi K2 ThinkingLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured78.5%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)29.1%83.8%Kimi K2 Thinking
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)5.3%23.8%Kimi K2 Thinking
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)23.2%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1253Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMArena Text: expert1223Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1253Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Gemma 3 4B and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BKimi K2 ThinkingLeader
AIMENot measured85.4%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured90.2%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
AA Math Index12.794.7Kimi K2 Thinking
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)12.7%94.7%Kimi K2 Thinking
OTIS Mock AIME7.5%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMArena Text: math1239Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1256Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for Gemma 3 4B and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BKimi K2 ThinkingLeader
MMLU ProNot measured81.1%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured80.2%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured65.7%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured60.6%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured71.7%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured92.6%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)41.7%84.8%Kimi K2 Thinking
LMArena Text: science1306Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1342Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1327Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1311Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Gemma 3 4B and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BKimi K2 ThinkingLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1113Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for Gemma 3 4B and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BKimi K2 ThinkingLeader
IFBench28.3%68.1%Kimi K2 Thinking
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)6.7%72.0%Kimi K2 Thinking
DTBench50.9%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMCA2.8%Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
CL-benchNot measured17.6%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LMArena Text1291Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1239Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1270Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMArena Text: English1300Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMArena Text: non-English1273Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMArena Text: German1281Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMArena Text: Russian1294Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1255Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1273Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1288Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1233Not measuredOnly Gemma 3 4B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Gemma 3 4B and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BKimi K2 ThinkingLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Gemma 3 4B$0.0001Fits in one request
Kimi K2 Thinking$0.0019Fits in one request

Gemma 3 4B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Gemma 3 4B$0.0025Fits in one request
Kimi K2 Thinking$0.037Fits in one request

Gemma 3 4B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Gemma 3 4B$0.0097Exceeds the context window
Kimi K2 Thinking$0.145Fits in one request

Gemma 3 4B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Gemma 3 4B and Kimi K2 Thinking
SpecificationGoogle Gemma 3 4BMoonshotAI Kimi K2 Thinking
MakerGoogleMoonshot AI
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 13, 2025November 6, 2025
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.045$0.60
Output $/Mtok$0.075$2.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.61
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Gemma 3 4B better than Kimi K2 Thinking for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Gemma 3 4B has the edge where output tokens cost 33.3x less, and where what matters is LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or Kimi K2 Thinking?

Gemma 3 4B costs $0.045 per million input tokens and $0.075 per million output tokens; Kimi K2 Thinking costs $0.60 and $2.50. Cost per solved task is known for Kimi K2 Thinking only.

Which has the bigger context window, Gemma 3 4B or Kimi K2 Thinking?

Kimi K2 Thinking, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Gemma 3 4B vs Kimi K2 Thinking comparison based on?

12 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Gemma 3 4B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Kimi K2 Thinking's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next