Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Ember-1 vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs 7.9x less per output token than Ember-1 ($1.90 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Ember-1Fireworks
Coding
52.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$15.00
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.90
vs $15.00 vs $1.90 per 1M output tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is 7.9x cheaper.

Ember-1 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: which to pick

Only Ember-1 has a coding score, 52.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for output tokens 7.9x cheaper ($1.90 vs $15.00 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Ember-1 has results on Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Code migration (Vals AI); Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and LMArena Text: coding. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Ember-1 52.6 from 2 benchmarks, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Ember-1 $15.00 against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct $1.90 per million output tokens, 7.9x apart.
Context window
Ember-1 takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index9 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Ember-1 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkEmber-1Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)20.7%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)83.9%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)32.5%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
IOI (Vals AI)46.3%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)69.5%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured64.6%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured11.4%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1438Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1442Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Ember-1 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkEmber-1Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured9.9Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Ember-1 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkEmber-1Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Finance Agent (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)31.1%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)44.7%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)63.4%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)67.0%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Vals Science Index31.8%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured54.1%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Ember-1 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkEmber-1Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)22.5%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured77.2%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured11.9%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1428Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1442Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1439Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1255Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1277Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Ember-1 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkEmber-1Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured88.3Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured88.3%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1425Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1419Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Ember-1 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkEmber-1Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.6%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1444Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1431Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1438Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1433Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index28 boards measured
General benchmarks for Ember-1 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkEmber-1Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)66.2%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
IFBenchNot measured56.5%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured63.7%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena TextNot measured1420Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1406Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1366Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1247Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1429Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1405Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1463Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1424Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1385Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1394Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1452Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1428Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1408Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1419Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1428Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1419Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1392Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1368Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1256Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1283Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1253Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1209Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1281Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1249Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1220Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Ember-1$0.011Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Ember-1$0.195Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.016Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Ember-1$0.750Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.061Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Ember-1 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
SpecificationFireworks Ember-1Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
MakerFireworksQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 24, 2026September 23, 2025
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$3.00$0.21
Output $/Mtok$15.00$1.90
Coding index52.6Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it20
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Ember-1 better than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for coding?

Only Ember-1 has a coding score, 52.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for output tokens 7.9x cheaper ($1.90 vs $15.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Ember-1 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Ember-1 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.21 and $1.90. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Ember-1 or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Ember-1, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

Has any benchmark tested both Ember-1 and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Ember-1 has results on Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Code migration (Vals AI); Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and LMArena Text: coding. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next