Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Ember-1 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs 4.3x less per output token than Ember-1 ($3.50 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Ember-1Fireworks
Coding
52.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$15.00
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
52.9
Output $/M
$3.50
vs $15.00 vs $3.50 per 1M output tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 4.3x cheaper.

Ember-1 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which to pick

Only Ember-1 has a coding score, 52.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for output tokens 4.3x cheaper ($3.50 vs $15.00 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Ember-1 has results on Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Code migration (Vals AI); Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on AA Coding Index, WeirdML and LMArena Text: coding. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Ember-1 52.6 from 2 benchmarks, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Ember-1 $15.00 against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 $3.50 per million output tokens, 4.3x apart.
Context window
Ember-1 takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index9 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Ember-1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkEmber-1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Coding IndexNot measured22.1Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)20.7%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)83.9%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)32.5%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
IOI (Vals AI)46.3%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)69.5%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
WeirdMLNot measured41.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1424Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1431Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Ember-1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkEmber-1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured12.7Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Ember-1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkEmber-1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.3Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)31.1%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)44.7%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)63.4%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)67.0%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Vals Science Index31.8%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured-$11Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Ember-1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkEmber-1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)22.5%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured80.1%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured9.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1416Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1463Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1432Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Ember-1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkEmber-1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1412Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1435Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Ember-1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkEmber-1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured40.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1433Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1456Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1415Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1413Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Ember-1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkEmber-1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1052Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured942Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured956Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured950Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured997Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1032Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21 boards measured
General benchmarks for Ember-1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkEmber-1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)66.2%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
DTBenchNot measured80.3%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMCANot measured29.3%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured75.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured82.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1415Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1386Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1384Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1429Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1397Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1481Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1408Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1386Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1375Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1389Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1401Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1390Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1406Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1400Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1388Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1370Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Ember-1$0.011Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.0022Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Ember-1$0.195Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.033Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Ember-1$0.750Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.125Exceeds the context window

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Ember-1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
SpecificationFireworks Ember-1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
MakerFireworksQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 24, 2026July 25, 2025
Context window1.05M128K
Input $/Mtok$3.00$0.45
Output $/Mtok$15.00$3.50
Coding index52.6Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it20
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Ember-1 better than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for coding?

Only Ember-1 has a coding score, 52.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for output tokens 4.3x cheaper ($3.50 vs $15.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Ember-1 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Ember-1 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.45 and $3.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Ember-1 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Ember-1, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both Ember-1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Ember-1 has results on Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Code migration (Vals AI); Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on AA Coding Index, WeirdML and LMArena Text: coding. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next