Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Ember-1 vs Nemotron 3 Super

Nemotron 3 Super costs 33.3x less per output token than Ember-1 ($0.45 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Ember-1Fireworks
Coding
52.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$15.00
Nemotron 3 SuperNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.45
vs $15.00 vs $0.45 per 1M output tokens. Nemotron 3 Super is 33.3x cheaper.

Ember-1 or Nemotron 3 Super: which to pick

Only Ember-1 has a coding score, 52.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nemotron 3 Super has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nemotron 3 Super for output tokens 33.3x cheaper ($0.45 vs $15.00 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Ember-1 has results on Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Code migration (Vals AI); Nemotron 3 Super on AA Coding Index, SciCode and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Ember-1 52.6 from 2 benchmarks, Nemotron 3 Super not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Ember-1 $15.00 against Nemotron 3 Super $0.45 per million output tokens, 33.3x apart.
Context window
Ember-1 takes 1.05M tokens, Nemotron 3 Super 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index12 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Ember-1 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkEmber-1Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured37.7Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)20.7%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)83.9%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)32.5%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
IOI (Vals AI)46.3%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)69.5%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
SciCodeNot measured36.2%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured28.8%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
WeirdMLNot measured38.0%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
ALE-BenchNot measured213.9Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1403Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1409Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Ember-1 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkEmber-1Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured12.8Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Ember-1 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkEmber-1Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.7Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)31.1%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)44.7%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)63.4%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)67.0%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Vals Science Index31.8%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured67.8%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Ember-1 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkEmber-1Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)22.5%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.0%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured20.8%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1386Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1398Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1397Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Ember-1 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkEmber-1Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1380Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1405Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
MathArenaNot measured16.6%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Ember-1 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkEmber-1Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1387Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1383Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1392Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1364Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards measured
General benchmarks for Ember-1 and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkEmber-1Nemotron 3 SuperLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)66.2%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
IFBenchNot measured71.5%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured65.7%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena TextNot measured1378Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1347Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1317Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1400Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1356Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1431Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1341Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1403Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1418Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1336Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1346Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1369Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1362Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1332Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1336Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Ember-1$0.011Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.0003Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Ember-1$0.195Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.0056Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Ember-1$0.750Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.021Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Ember-1 and Nemotron 3 Super
SpecificationFireworks Ember-1NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
MakerFireworksNVIDIA
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 24, 2026March 11, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$3.00$0.085
Output $/Mtok$15.00$0.45
Coding index52.6Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it20
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Ember-1 better than Nemotron 3 Super for coding?

Only Ember-1 has a coding score, 52.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nemotron 3 Super has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3 Super for output tokens 33.3x cheaper ($0.45 vs $15.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Ember-1 or Nemotron 3 Super?

Ember-1 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Super costs $0.085 and $0.45. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Ember-1 or Nemotron 3 Super?

Ember-1, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

Has any benchmark tested both Ember-1 and Nemotron 3 Super?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Ember-1 has results on Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Code migration (Vals AI); Nemotron 3 Super on AA Coding Index, SciCode and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next