Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Ember-1 vs Mistral Small 4

Mistral Small 4 costs 25.0x less per output token than Ember-1 ($0.60 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

Ember-1Fireworks
Coding
52.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$15.00
1
Mistral Small 4Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
vs boards won of 1 shared

Ember-1 or Mistral Small 4: which to pick

Only Ember-1 has a coding score, 52.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Small 4 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mistral Small 4 for output tokens 25.0x cheaper ($0.60 vs $15.00 per million).

Shared results
1
Ember-1 only
13
Mistral Small 4 only
14
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Ember-1 52.6 from 2 benchmarks, Mistral Small 4 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 83.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Ember-1 83.9% against Mistral Small 4 0.0%, 83.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Ember-1 $15.00 against Mistral Small 4 $0.60 per million output tokens, 25.0x apart.
Context window
Ember-1 takes 1.05M tokens, Mistral Small 4 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryEmber-1BarsMistral Small 4Ties
Coding10
All shared boards10
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for Ember-1 and Mistral Small 4
BenchmarkEmber-1Mistral Small 4Leader
AA Coding IndexNot measured26.6Only Mistral Small 4 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)20.7%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)83.9%0.0%Ember-1
Code migration (Vals AI)32.5%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
IOI (Vals AI)46.3%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)69.5%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
SciCodeNot measured38.8%Only Mistral Small 4 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured17.4%Only Mistral Small 4 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured497.6Only Mistral Small 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Ember-1 and Mistral Small 4
BenchmarkEmber-1Mistral Small 4Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured11.3Only Mistral Small 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Ember-1 and Mistral Small 4
BenchmarkEmber-1Mistral Small 4Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured0.8Only Mistral Small 4 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)31.1%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)44.7%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)63.4%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)67.0%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Vals Science Index31.8%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured41.2%Only Mistral Small 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Ember-1 and Mistral Small 4
BenchmarkEmber-1Mistral Small 4Leader
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)22.5%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured76.9%Only Mistral Small 4 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured9.9%Only Mistral Small 4 measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured40.5%Only Mistral Small 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Ember-1 and Mistral Small 4
BenchmarkEmber-1Mistral Small 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 13 boards here
KnowledgeNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Ember-1 and Mistral Small 4
BenchmarkEmber-1Mistral Small 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 18 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Ember-1 and Mistral Small 4
BenchmarkEmber-1Mistral Small 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Ember-1 and Mistral Small 4
BenchmarkEmber-1Mistral Small 4Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)66.2%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
IFBenchNot measured48.2%Only Mistral Small 4 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured49.7%Only Mistral Small 4 measured
DTBenchNot measured70.9%Only Mistral Small 4 measured
LMCANot measured20.6%Only Mistral Small 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Ember-1 and Mistral Small 4
BenchmarkEmber-1Mistral Small 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Ember-1$0.011Fits in one request
Mistral Small 4$0.0004Fits in one request

Mistral Small 4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Ember-1$0.195Fits in one request
Mistral Small 4$0.0093Fits in one request

Mistral Small 4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Ember-1$0.750Fits in one request
Mistral Small 4$0.036Fits in one request

Mistral Small 4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Ember-1 and Mistral Small 4
SpecificationFireworks Ember-1Mistral Small 4
MakerFireworksMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 24, 2026March 16, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$3.00$0.15
Output $/Mtok$15.00$0.60
Coding index52.6Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Ember-1 better than Mistral Small 4 for coding?

Only Ember-1 has a coding score, 52.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Small 4 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mistral Small 4 for output tokens 25.0x cheaper ($0.60 vs $15.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Ember-1 or Mistral Small 4?

Ember-1 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 4 costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Ember-1 or Mistral Small 4?

Ember-1, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Ember-1 vs Mistral Small 4 comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Ember-1's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Mistral Small 4's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next