Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Ember-1 vs Mistral Large 2407

Mistral Large 2407 costs 2.5x less per output token than Ember-1 ($6.00 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Ember-1Fireworks
Coding
52.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$15.00
Mistral Large 2407Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$6.00
vs $15.00 vs $6.00 per 1M output tokens. Mistral Large 2407 is 2.5x cheaper.

Ember-1 or Mistral Large 2407: which to pick

Only Ember-1 has a coding score, 52.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Large 2407 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mistral Large 2407 for output tokens 2.5x cheaper ($6.00 vs $15.00 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Ember-1 has results on Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Code migration (Vals AI); Mistral Large 2407 on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), AA Intelligence Index and τ²-Bench Telecom. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Ember-1 52.6 from 2 benchmarks, Mistral Large 2407 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Ember-1 $15.00 against Mistral Large 2407 $6.00 per million output tokens, 2.5x apart.
Context window
Ember-1 takes 1.05M tokens, Mistral Large 2407 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index6 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Ember-1 and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkEmber-1Mistral Large 2407Leader
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)20.7%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)83.9%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)32.5%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
IOI (Vals AI)46.3%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)69.5%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured26.7%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Ember-1 and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkEmber-1Mistral Large 2407Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured7.6Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Ember-1 and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkEmber-1Mistral Large 2407Leader
Finance Agent (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)31.1%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)44.7%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)63.4%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)67.0%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Vals Science Index31.8%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured33.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Ember-1 and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkEmber-1Mistral Large 2407Leader
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)22.5%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured47.2%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured2.9%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured49.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured22.5%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Ember-1 and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkEmber-1Mistral Large 2407Leader
AA Math IndexNot measured0.0Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured0.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured8.5%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
MATH level 5Not measured44.8%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Ember-1 and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkEmber-1Mistral Large 2407Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured68.3%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
MMLUNot measured80.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
General benchmarks for Ember-1 and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkEmber-1Mistral Large 2407Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)66.2%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
IFBenchNot measured31.6%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured2.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
DTBenchNot measured61.2%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured69.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Ember-1$0.011Fits in one request
Mistral Large 2407$0.0050Fits in one request

Mistral Large 2407 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Ember-1$0.195Fits in one request
Mistral Large 2407$0.118Fits in one request

Mistral Large 2407 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Ember-1$0.750Fits in one request
Mistral Large 2407$0.460Exceeds the context window

Mistral Large 2407 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Ember-1 and Mistral Large 2407
SpecificationFireworks Ember-1Mistral Large 2407
MakerFireworksMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 24, 2026November 19, 2024
Context window1.05M131K
Input $/Mtok$3.00$2.00
Output $/Mtok$15.00$6.00
Coding index52.6Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it20
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Ember-1 better than Mistral Large 2407 for coding?

Only Ember-1 has a coding score, 52.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Large 2407 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mistral Large 2407 for output tokens 2.5x cheaper ($6.00 vs $15.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Ember-1 or Mistral Large 2407?

Ember-1 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 2407 costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Ember-1 or Mistral Large 2407?

Ember-1, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

Has any benchmark tested both Ember-1 and Mistral Large 2407?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Ember-1 has results on Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Code migration (Vals AI); Mistral Large 2407 on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), AA Intelligence Index and τ²-Bench Telecom. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next