Ember-1 vs Ministral 3 14B 2512
Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs 75.0x less per output token than Ember-1 ($0.20 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.
- Coding
- 52.6
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $15.00
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $0.20
Ember-1 or Ministral 3 14B 2512: which to pick
Only Ember-1 has a coding score, 52.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Ministral 3 14B 2512 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Ministral 3 14B 2512 for output tokens 75.0x cheaper ($0.20 vs $15.00 per million).
No benchmark has tested both yet. Ember-1 has results on Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Code migration (Vals AI); Ministral 3 14B 2512 on AA Coding Index, AA Intelligence Index and AA Agentic Index. Compare them on price and context instead.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only Ember-1 has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 has a AA Intelligence Index result, 6.0.
Directional only
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 has a AA Agentic Index result, 1.1.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1081.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Ember-1
Ember-1 takes 1.05M tokens against 262K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Ministral 3 14B 2512
Ember-1 $0.011, Ministral 3 14B 2512 $0.0003 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Ember-1 52.6 from 2 benchmarks, Ministral 3 14B 2512 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- Ember-1 $15.00 against Ministral 3 14B 2512 $0.20 per million output tokens, 75.0x apart.
- Context window
- Ember-1 takes 1.05M tokens, Ministral 3 14B 2512 262K.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index6 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Ministral 3 14B 2512 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 14.4 | Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 20.7% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 83.9% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 32.5% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 46.3% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 69.5% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Ministral 3 14B 2512 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | Not measured | 6.0 | Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Ministral 3 14B 2512 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 1.1 | Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 51.8% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 31.1% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 44.7% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 63.4% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 67.0% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 5.7% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Vals Science Index | 31.8% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here | |||
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Ministral 3 14B 2512 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 22.5% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Ministral 3 14B 2512 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | Not measured | 1081 | Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | Not measured | 1037 | Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 989 | Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | Not measured | 1064 | Only Ministral 3 14B 2512 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
| Benchmark | Ember-1 | Ministral 3 14B 2512 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 66.2% | Not measured | Only Ember-1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 47 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Fireworks Ember-1 | Mistral Ministral 3 14B 2512 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Fireworks | Mistral AI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | September 24, 2026 | December 2, 2025 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 262K |
| Input $/Mtok | $3.00 | $0.20 |
| Output $/Mtok | $15.00 | $0.20 |
| Coding index | 52.6 | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 2 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Ember-1 better than Ministral 3 14B 2512 for coding?
Only Ember-1 has a coding score, 52.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Ministral 3 14B 2512 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Ministral 3 14B 2512 for output tokens 75.0x cheaper ($0.20 vs $15.00 per million).
Which is cheaper, Ember-1 or Ministral 3 14B 2512?
Ember-1 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Ministral 3 14B 2512 costs $0.20 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Ember-1 or Ministral 3 14B 2512?
Ember-1, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
Has any benchmark tested both Ember-1 and Ministral 3 14B 2512?
No benchmark has tested both yet. Ember-1 has results on Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Code migration (Vals AI); Ministral 3 14B 2512 on AA Coding Index, AA Intelligence Index and AA Agentic Index. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.