Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Ember-1 vs Llama Guard 4 12B

Llama Guard 4 12B costs 83.3x less per output token than Ember-1 ($0.18 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Ember-1Fireworks
Coding
52.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$15.00
Llama Guard 4 12BMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.18
vs $15.00 vs $0.18 per 1M output tokens. Llama Guard 4 12B is 83.3x cheaper.

Ember-1 or Llama Guard 4 12B: which to pick

Only Ember-1 has a coding score, 52.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama Guard 4 12B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama Guard 4 12B for output tokens 83.3x cheaper ($0.18 vs $15.00 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Ember-1 has results on Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Code migration (Vals AI); Llama Guard 4 12B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Ember-1 52.6 from 2 benchmarks, Llama Guard 4 12B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Ember-1 $15.00 against Llama Guard 4 12B $0.18 per million output tokens, 83.3x apart.
Context window
Ember-1 takes 1.05M tokens, Llama Guard 4 12B 164K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Ember-1 and Llama Guard 4 12B
BenchmarkEmber-1Llama Guard 4 12BLeader
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)20.7%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)83.9%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)32.5%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
IOI (Vals AI)46.3%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)69.5%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Ember-1 and Llama Guard 4 12B
BenchmarkEmber-1Llama Guard 4 12BLeader
Finance Agent (Vals AI)51.8%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)31.1%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)44.7%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)63.4%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)67.0%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)5.7%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Vals Science Index31.8%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Ember-1 and Llama Guard 4 12B
BenchmarkEmber-1Llama Guard 4 12BLeader
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)22.5%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
General benchmarks for Ember-1 and Llama Guard 4 12B
BenchmarkEmber-1Llama Guard 4 12BLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)66.2%Not measuredOnly Ember-1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 45 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Ember-1$0.011Fits in one request
Llama Guard 4 12B$0.0003Fits in one request

Llama Guard 4 12B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Ember-1$0.195Fits in one request
Llama Guard 4 12B$0.0095Fits in one request

Llama Guard 4 12B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Ember-1$0.750Fits in one request
Llama Guard 4 12B$0.038Exceeds the context window

Llama Guard 4 12B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Ember-1 and Llama Guard 4 12B
SpecificationFireworks Ember-1Meta Llama Guard 4 12B
MakerFireworksMeta Llama
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 24, 2026April 30, 2025
Context window1.05M164K
Input $/Mtok$3.00$0.18
Output $/Mtok$15.00$0.18
Coding index52.6Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it20
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Ember-1 better than Llama Guard 4 12B for coding?

Only Ember-1 has a coding score, 52.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama Guard 4 12B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama Guard 4 12B for output tokens 83.3x cheaper ($0.18 vs $15.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Ember-1 or Llama Guard 4 12B?

Ember-1 costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Llama Guard 4 12B costs $0.18 and $0.18. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Ember-1 or Llama Guard 4 12B?

Ember-1, with 1.05M tokens against 164K.

Has any benchmark tested both Ember-1 and Llama Guard 4 12B?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Ember-1 has results on Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Code migration (Vals AI); Llama Guard 4 12B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next