LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Kimi K2 Thinking

Updated October 21, 2026. 5 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423DeepSeek
Coding
54.6
Overall
24.4
Output $/M
$0.182
5
Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AI
Coding
63.4
Overall
22.0
Output $/M
$2.50
0
vs boards won of 5 shared

Decision reading

Pick Kimi K2 Thinking for coding: it scores 63.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 54.6 for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423.

Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 when output tokens cost 13.7x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 262K tokens.

Shared results
5
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 only
43
Kimi K2 Thinking only
25
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 54.6 from 1 benchmark, Kimi K2 Thinking 63.4 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Web design, 11.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: websites: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 1208 against Kimi K2 Thinking 1113, 11.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 $0.182 against Kimi K2 Thinking $2.50 per million output tokens, 13.7x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 takes 1.05M tokens, Kimi K2 Thinking 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423BarsKimi K2 ThinkingTies
Coding20
Intelligence20
Web design10
All shared boards50
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Kimi K2 ThinkingLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured63.4%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LMArena WebDev1582Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
AA Coding Index52.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured63.1%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured60.2%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured85.3%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured31.1%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured35.7%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
WeirdML45.6%42.8%DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
ALE-Bench678.2597.5DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
LMArena Text: coding1457Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1453Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1585Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1558Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Kimi K2 ThinkingLeader
AA Intelligence Index24.422.0DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
Epoch Capabilities Index146.1145.8DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Kimi K2 ThinkingLeader
AA Agentic Index26.3Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured93.0%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
METR time horizonsNot measured59.2%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Kimi K2 ThinkingLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured78.5%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.8%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured23.8%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
SimpleBench46.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1444Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: expert1441Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1449Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Kimi K2 ThinkingLeader
AIMENot measured85.4%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured90.2%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
AA Math IndexNot measured94.7Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured94.7%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LMArena Text: math1426Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1432Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Kimi K2 ThinkingLeader
MMLU ProNot measured81.1%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured80.2%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured65.7%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured60.6%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured71.7%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured92.6%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured84.8%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LMArena Text: science1446Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1448Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1439Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1425Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Kimi K2 ThinkingLeader
Design Arena: websites12081113DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
Design Arena: UI components1164Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: game dev1197Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: data viz1127Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: 3D1189Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1205Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: SVG1155Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1109Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Kimi K2 ThinkingLeader
IFBenchNot measured68.1%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured72.0%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
DTBench86.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMCA35.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
CL-benchNot measured17.6%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LMArena Text1432Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1421Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1403Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: English1441Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1419Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1463Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: German1419Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1389Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1383Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: French1439Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1436Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1427Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1436Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1449Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1434Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1410Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1400Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423Kimi K2 ThinkingLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423$0.0002Fits in one request
Kimi K2 Thinking$0.0019Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423$0.0051Fits in one request
Kimi K2 Thinking$0.037Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423$0.020Fits in one request
Kimi K2 Thinking$0.145Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 and Kimi K2 Thinking
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423MoonshotAI Kimi K2 Thinking
MakerDeepSeekMoonshot AI
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedApril 24, 2026November 6, 2025
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.091$0.60
Output $/Mtok$0.182$2.50
Coding index54.663.4
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.61
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 better than Kimi K2 Thinking for coding?

Pick Kimi K2 Thinking for coding: it scores 63.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 54.6 for DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423. Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 when output tokens cost 13.7x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 262K tokens.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 or Kimi K2 Thinking?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 costs $0.091 per million input tokens and $0.182 per million output tokens; Kimi K2 Thinking costs $0.60 and $2.50. Cost per solved task is known for Kimi K2 Thinking only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 or Kimi K2 Thinking?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Kimi K2 Thinking comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Kimi K2 Thinking's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next