DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs gpt-oss-20b
Updated October 21, 2026. 35 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 has the edge where the context window is larger, 1.05M against 131K tokens.
- Shared results
- 35
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 only
- 13
- gpt-oss-20b only
- 25
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 leads, 24.4 against 10.0.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 has a AA Agentic Index result, 26.3.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only gpt-oss-20b has a GPQA Diamond result, 68.9%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only gpt-oss-20b has a AIME result, 86.0%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only gpt-oss-20b has a MMLU Pro result, 71.6%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 leads, 1208 against 853.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 takes 1.05M tokens against 131K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
gpt-oss-20b
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 $0.0003, gpt-oss-20b $0.0001 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 not benchmarked, gpt-oss-20b not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Web design, 34.3 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Design Arena: websites: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 1208 against gpt-oss-20b 853, 44.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 $0.28 against gpt-oss-20b $0.15 per million output tokens, 1.9x apart.
- Context window
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 takes 1.05M tokens, gpt-oss-20b 131K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | Bars | gpt-oss-20b | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 4 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 2 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 3 | 0 | ||
| Math | 2 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 4 | 0 | ||
| Web design | 2 | 0 | ||
| General | 18 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 35 | 0 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index40
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | gpt-oss-20b | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1582 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| AA Coding Index | 52.0 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 80.4% | Only gpt-oss-20b measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 77.7% | Only gpt-oss-20b measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 38.9% | Only gpt-oss-20b measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 10.6% | Only gpt-oss-20b measured |
| Terminal-Bench | Not measured | 3.4% | Only gpt-oss-20b measured |
| WeirdML | 45.6% | 40.9% | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| ALE-Bench | 678.2 | 566.0 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1457 | 1307 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1453 | 1311 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1585 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1558 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | gpt-oss-20b | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 24.4 | 10.0 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.1 | 137.7 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | gpt-oss-20b | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 26.3 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 60.2% | Only gpt-oss-20b measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | gpt-oss-20b | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | Not measured | 68.9% | Only gpt-oss-20b measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 68.8% | Only gpt-oss-20b measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 11.0% | Only gpt-oss-20b measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 60.8% | Only gpt-oss-20b measured |
| SimpleBench | 46.3% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1444 | 1274 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1441 | 1258 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1449 | 1292 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | gpt-oss-20b | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | Not measured | 86.0% | Only gpt-oss-20b measured |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 94.2% | Only gpt-oss-20b measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | Not measured | 89.0% | Only gpt-oss-20b measured |
| AA Math Index | Not measured | 89.3 | Only gpt-oss-20b measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 89.3% | Only gpt-oss-20b measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 65.3% | Only gpt-oss-20b measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1426 | 1317 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1432 | 1305 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | gpt-oss-20b | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | Not measured | 71.6% | Only gpt-oss-20b measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 70.8% | Only gpt-oss-20b measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | Not measured | 43.8% | Only gpt-oss-20b measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | Not measured | 53.1% | Only gpt-oss-20b measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | Not measured | 63.7% | Only gpt-oss-20b measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | Not measured | 82.9% | Only gpt-oss-20b measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 74.8% | Only gpt-oss-20b measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1446 | 1296 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1448 | 1310 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1439 | 1280 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1425 | 1284 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | gpt-oss-20b | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1208 | 853 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1165 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1197 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1127 | 933 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1189 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1205 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1155 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1109 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index180
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | gpt-oss-20b | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | Not measured | 65.1% | Only gpt-oss-20b measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 34.7% | Only gpt-oss-20b measured |
| DTBench | 86.4% | 68.0% | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMCA | 35.9% | 14.5% | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text | 1432 | 1288 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1421 | 1236 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1403 | 1201 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1441 | 1303 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1419 | 1269 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1463 | 1315 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1419 | 1255 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1389 | 1244 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1383 | 1236 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1439 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1436 | 1267 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1427 | 1278 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1436 | 1252 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1449 | 1268 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1434 | 1250 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1410 | 1238 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1400 | 1216 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | gpt-oss-20b | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
gpt-oss-20b costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
gpt-oss-20b costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
gpt-oss-20b costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 | OpenAI gpt-oss-20b |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | DeepSeek | OpenAI |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | April 24, 2026 | August 5, 2025 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 131K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.14 | $0.03 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.28 | $0.15 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 1 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 better than gpt-oss-20b for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 has the edge where the context window is larger, 1.05M against 131K tokens.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 or gpt-oss-20b?
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 costs $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; gpt-oss-20b costs $0.03 and $0.15. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 or gpt-oss-20b?
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs gpt-oss-20b comparison based on?
35 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and gpt-oss-20b's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.