Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Kimi K2 Thinking

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp leads Kimi K2 Thinking on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 34.8 to 22.0, and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs 1.9x less per output token ($1.32 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
56.4
Output $/M
$1.32
4
Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.50
0
vs boards won of 4 shared

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Kimi K2 Thinking: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp for output tokens 1.9x cheaper ($1.32 vs $2.50 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

Shared results
4
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp only
10
Kimi K2 Thinking only
26
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp not benchmarked, Kimi K2 Thinking not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 12.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp 34.8 against Kimi K2 Thinking 22.0, 12.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp $1.32 against Kimi K2 Thinking $2.50 per million output tokens, 1.9x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp takes 1.05M tokens, Kimi K2 Thinking 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpBarsKimi K2 ThinkingTies
Intelligence10
Reasoning20
General10
All shared boards40
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index11 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpKimi K2 ThinkingLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured63.4%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LiveBench coding37.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
AA Coding Index65.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured63.1%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured60.2%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured85.3%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
SciCode49.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured31.1%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured35.7%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
WeirdMLNot measured42.8%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
ALE-BenchNot measured597.5Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpKimi K2 ThinkingLeader
AA Intelligence Index34.822.0DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured145.8Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpKimi K2 ThinkingLeader
AA Agentic Index47.5Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveBench research69.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveBench browser64.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
LiveBench long agentic39.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured93.0%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
METR time horizonsNot measured59.2%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpKimi K2 ThinkingLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured78.5%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LiveBench reasoning85.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)91.3%83.8%DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)34.5%23.8%DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpKimi K2 ThinkingLeader
AIMENot measured85.4%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured90.2%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
AA Math IndexNot measured94.7Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured94.7%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpKimi K2 ThinkingLeader
MMLU ProNot measured81.1%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured80.2%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured65.7%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured60.6%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured71.7%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured92.6%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured84.8%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpKimi K2 ThinkingLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1113Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LiveBench design70.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpKimi K2 ThinkingLeader
LiveBench data analysis79.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp measured
IFBenchNot measured68.1%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)81.3%72.0%DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
CL-benchNot measured17.6%Only Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 42 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Kimi K2 Thinking
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpKimi K2 ThinkingLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$0.0011Fits in one request
Kimi K2 Thinking$0.0019Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$0.026Fits in one request
Kimi K2 Thinking$0.037Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$0.101Fits in one request
Kimi K2 Thinking$0.145Fits in one request

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Kimi K2 Thinking
SpecificationDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpMoonshotAI Kimi K2 Thinking
MakerDeepSeekMoonshot AI
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 21, 2026November 6, 2025
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.44$0.60
Output $/Mtok$1.32$2.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.61
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp better than Kimi K2 Thinking for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp for output tokens 1.9x cheaper ($1.32 vs $2.50 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Kimi K2 Thinking?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs $0.44 per million input tokens and $1.32 per million output tokens; Kimi K2 Thinking costs $0.60 and $2.50. Cost per solved task is known for Kimi K2 Thinking only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Kimi K2 Thinking?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Kimi K2 Thinking comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Kimi K2 Thinking's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next