Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

DeepSeek V3.2 leads Qwen3.6 35B A3B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 21.5 to 18.2, at about the same output price ($0.88 vs $1.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 12 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek
Coding
30.0
Overall
37.9
Output $/M
$0.88
8
Qwen3.6 35B A3BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
45.0
Output $/M
$1.00
4
vs boards won of 12 shared

DeepSeek V3.2 or Qwen3.6 35B A3B: which to pick

Only DeepSeek V3.2 has a coding score, 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.6 35B A3B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3.6 35B A3B for a larger context window (262K against 164K tokens) and work measured by τ²-Bench Telecom or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
12
DeepSeek V3.2 only
63
Qwen3.6 35B A3B only
8
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.2 30.0 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen3.6 35B A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 6.0 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench: DeepSeek V3.2 39.6% against Qwen3.6 35B A3B 24.6%, 14.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.2 $0.88 against Qwen3.6 35B A3B $1.00 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.2 takes 164K tokens, Qwen3.6 35B A3B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.2BarsQwen3.6 35B A3BTies
Coding30
Intelligence20
Agentic work01
Reasoning11
General22
All shared boards84
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index30
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
SWE-bench Verified70.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual59.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena WebDev1362Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
AA Coding Index44.241.9DeepSeek V3.2
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)80.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)67.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)5.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)86.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
SciCodeNot measured36.6%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)35.6%34.8%DeepSeek V3.2
Terminal-Bench39.6%24.6%DeepSeek V3.2
WeirdMLNot measured34.5%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
LMArena Text: coding1453Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1449Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1350Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1371Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
AA Intelligence Index21.518.2DeepSeek V3.2
Epoch Capabilities Index146.1143.7DeepSeek V3.2
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured13.1Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
τ²-Bench Telecom90.6%95.3%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
APEX-Agents21.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Vending-Bench 2$1,034Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
GPQA Diamond80.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.0%84.1%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)24.6%22.2%DeepSeek V3.2
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured84.8%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
ARC-AGI57.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
ARC-AGI-24.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured22.0%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1434Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: expert1436Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1446Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
AIME84.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)86.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
AA Math Index92.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)92.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured20.4%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
LMArena Text: math1435Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1440Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
MMLU Pro84.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)76.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)55.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)51.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)68.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)93.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)86.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: science1446Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1440Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1425Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1410Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
Design Arena: websites1175Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: UI components1146Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: game dev1131Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: data viz1158Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: 3D1132Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1163Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: SVG1032Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1083Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
IFBench60.7%64.4%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)73.3%71.7%DeepSeek V3.2
DTBench85.6%73.9%DeepSeek V3.2
LMCA28.8%29.7%Qwen3.6 35B A3B
CL-bench12.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured44.4%Only Qwen3.6 35B A3B measured
CL-bench Life7.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text1425Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1413Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1400Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: English1439Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1409Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1455Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: German1413Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1374Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1370Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: French1429Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1424Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1424Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1419Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1427Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1428Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1407Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1395Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Qwen3.6 35B A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2$0.0007Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.0006Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2$0.017Fits in one request
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.0080Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2$0.067Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.6 35B A3B$0.030Fits in one request

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.2 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.2Qwen3.6 35B A3B
MakerDeepSeekQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 1, 2025April 27, 2026
Context window164K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.29$0.10
Output $/Mtok$0.88$1.00
Coding index30.0Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$0.99Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.2 better than Qwen3.6 35B A3B for coding?

Only DeepSeek V3.2 has a coding score, 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.6 35B A3B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3.6 35B A3B for a larger context window (262K against 164K tokens) and work measured by τ²-Bench Telecom or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

DeepSeek V3.2 costs $0.29 per million input tokens and $0.88 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs $0.10 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for DeepSeek V3.2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 or Qwen3.6 35B A3B?

Qwen3.6 35B A3B, with 262K tokens against 164K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.2 vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B comparison based on?

12 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V3.2's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.6 35B A3B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next