Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.2 vs Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

DeepSeek V3.2 leads Llama 3.1 8B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 21.5 to 6.9, and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs 11.0x less per output token ($0.08 vs $0.88 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 42 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace DeepSeek V3.2 Replace Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
DeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek
Coding
30.0
Overall
37.9
Output $/M
$0.88
42
Llama 3.1 8B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
17.9
Output $/M
$0.08
0
vs boards won of 42 shared

DeepSeek V3.2 or Llama 3.1 8B Instruct: which to pick

Only DeepSeek V3.2 has a coding score, 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.1 8B Instruct for output tokens 11.0x cheaper ($0.08 vs $0.88 per million).

Model ADeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek30.0/1003 independent benchmarks$0.99 per solved taskModel BLlama 3.1 8B InstructMeta LlamaNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task
Shared results
42
DeepSeek V3.2 only
33
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct only
9
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.2 30.0 from 3 benchmarks, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 74.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Math Index: DeepSeek V3.2 92.0 against Llama 3.1 8B Instruct 4.3, 87.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.2 $0.88 against Llama 3.1 8B Instruct $0.08 per million output tokens, 11.0x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.2 takes 164K tokens, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.2BarsLlama 3.1 8B InstructTies
Coding50
Intelligence20
Agentic work10
Reasoning50
Math40
Knowledge50
General200
All shared boards420
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Llama 3.1 8B InstructLeader
SWE-bench Verified70.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual59.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena WebDev1362Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
AA Coding Index44.25.4DeepSeek V3.2
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)80.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)67.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)5.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)86.2%11.6%DeepSeek V3.2
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)35.6%0.8%DeepSeek V3.2
Terminal-Bench39.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
WeirdMLNot measured1.7%Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: coding14531195DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: software and IT14491195DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena WebDev: React1350Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1371Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Llama 3.1 8B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index21.56.9DeepSeek V3.2
Epoch Capabilities Index146.1116.5DeepSeek V3.2
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Llama 3.1 8B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom90.6%16.4%DeepSeek V3.2
APEX-Agents21.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
BALROGNot measured15.1%Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Vending-Bench 2$1,034Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured25.8%Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Llama 3.1 8B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond80.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.0%25.9%DeepSeek V3.2
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)24.6%5.3%DeepSeek V3.2
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured27.0%Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
ARC-AGI57.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
ARC-AGI-24.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14341175DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: expert14361144DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14461196DeepSeek V3.2
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Llama 3.1 8B InstructLeader
AIME84.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)86.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
AA Math Index92.04.3DeepSeek V3.2
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)92.0%4.3%DeepSeek V3.2
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured1.7%Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
MATH level 5Not measured22.9%Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
GSM8KNot measured82.4%Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math14351179DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: mathematical work14401180DeepSeek V3.2
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Llama 3.1 8B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro84.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)76.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)55.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)51.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)68.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)93.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)86.2%47.6%DeepSeek V3.2
MMLUNot measured56.1%Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science14461193DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14401182DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: legal and government14251206DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: business and finance14101166DeepSeek V3.2
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Llama 3.1 8B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1175Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: UI components1149Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: game dev1132Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: data viz1158Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: 3D1133Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1164Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: SVG1032Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1083Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index200
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Llama 3.1 8B InstructLeader
IFBench60.7%28.6%DeepSeek V3.2
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)73.3%18.0%DeepSeek V3.2
DTBench85.6%50.9%DeepSeek V3.2
LMCA28.8%5.4%DeepSeek V3.2
CL-bench12.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
PIQANot measured81.2%Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
CL-bench Life7.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text14251187DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: instruction following14131159DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: creative writing14001154DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: English14391218DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: non-English14091148DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: Chinese14551151DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: German14131144DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: Japanese13741061DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: Korean13701053DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: French14291178DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: Spanish14241169DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: Russian14241158DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: Polish1419Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14271172DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: longer queries14281181DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: writing and language14071162DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13951145DeepSeek V3.2
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Llama 3.1 8B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2$0.0007Fits in one request
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.0001Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2$0.017Fits in one request
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.0027Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2$0.067Exceeds the context window
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.011Exceeds the context window

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.2 and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.2Meta Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
MakerDeepSeekMeta Llama
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 1, 2025July 23, 2024
Context window164K131K
Input $/Mtok$0.29$0.05
Output $/Mtok$0.88$0.08
Coding index30.0Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$0.99Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.2 better than Llama 3.1 8B Instruct for coding?

Only DeepSeek V3.2 has a coding score, 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.1 8B Instruct for output tokens 11.0x cheaper ($0.08 vs $0.88 per million).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 or Llama 3.1 8B Instruct?

DeepSeek V3.2 costs $0.29 per million input tokens and $0.88 per million output tokens; Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs $0.05 and $0.08. Cost per solved task is known for DeepSeek V3.2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 or Llama 3.1 8B Instruct?

DeepSeek V3.2, with 164K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.2 vs Llama 3.1 8B Instruct comparison based on?

42 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V3.2's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next