Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs 1.5x less per output token than DeepSeek V3.2 ($0.60 vs $0.88 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 28 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek
Coding
30.0
Overall
37.9
Output $/M
$0.88
28
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
vs boards won of 28 shared

DeepSeek V3.2 or GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18): which to pick

Only DeepSeek V3.2 has a coding score, 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($0.60 vs $0.88 per million).

Shared results
28
DeepSeek V3.2 only
47
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) only
18
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.2 30.0 from 3 benchmarks, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 29.8 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: expert: DeepSeek V3.2 1436 against GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 1234, 33.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.2 $0.88 against GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) $0.60 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.2 takes 164K tokens, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.2BarsGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Ties
Coding20
Reasoning30
Math20
Knowledge40
General170
All shared boards280
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Aider polyglotNot measured3.6%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
SWE-bench Verified70.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual59.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena WebDev1362Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
AA Coding Index44.2Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)80.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)67.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)5.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)86.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)35.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Terminal-Bench39.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
WeirdMLNot measured11.8%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: coding14531290DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: software and IT14491291DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena WebDev: React1350Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1371Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
AA Intelligence Index21.5Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index146.1Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom90.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
APEX-Agents21.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
BALROGNot measured17.4%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Vending-Bench 2$1,034Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
GPQA Diamond80.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)24.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured37.7%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
ARC-AGI57.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
ARC-AGI-24.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured10.7%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured3.0%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured12.0%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
VPCTNot measured34.0%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14341267DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: expert14361234DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14461278DeepSeek V3.2
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
AIME84.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)86.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
AA Math Index92.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)92.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured6.9%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured0.7%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
MATH level 5Not measured52.6%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: math14351267DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: mathematical work14401271DeepSeek V3.2
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
MMLU Pro84.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)76.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)55.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)51.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)68.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)93.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)86.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured8.3%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
MMLUNot measured76.7%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
GeoBenchNot measured64.0%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: science14461286DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14401282DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: legal and government14251305DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: business and finance14101265DeepSeek V3.2
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Design Arena: websites1175Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: UI components1146Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: game dev1131Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: data viz1158Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: 3D1132Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1163Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: SVG1032Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1083Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index170
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
IFBench60.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)73.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
DTBench85.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMCA28.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured67.2%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
CL-bench12.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
CL-bench Life7.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text14251286DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: instruction following14131258DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: creative writing14001268DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena VisionNot measured1066Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: English14391301DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: non-English14091266DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: Chinese14551265DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: German14131272DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: Japanese13741216DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: Korean13701195DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: French14291297DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: Spanish14241276DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: Russian14241275DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: Polish14191244DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: multi-turn14271285DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: longer queries14281289DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: writing and language14071282DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13951253DeepSeek V3.2
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1072Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1033Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2$0.0007Fits in one request
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0004Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2$0.017Fits in one request
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0093Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2$0.067Exceeds the context window
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.036Exceeds the context window

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.2 and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.2OpenAI GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
MakerDeepSeekOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 1, 2025July 18, 2024
Context window164K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.29$0.15
Output $/Mtok$0.88$0.60
Coding index30.0Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$0.99Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.2 better than GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) for coding?

Only DeepSeek V3.2 has a coding score, 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) for output tokens 1.5x cheaper ($0.60 vs $0.88 per million).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 or GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)?

DeepSeek V3.2 costs $0.29 per million input tokens and $0.88 per million output tokens; GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for DeepSeek V3.2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 or GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)?

DeepSeek V3.2, with 164K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) comparison based on?

28 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V3.2's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)'s on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next