DeepSeek V3.2 vs Gemma 2 27B
Updated October 21, 2026. 32 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Only DeepSeek V3.2 has a coding score, 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 2 27B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Gemma 2 27B has the edge where output tokens cost 1.4x less.
- Shared results
- 32
- DeepSeek V3.2 only
- 43
- Gemma 2 27B only
- 4
- Like-for-like categories
- 6 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only DeepSeek V3.2 has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only DeepSeek V3.2 has a AA Intelligence Index result, 21.5.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only DeepSeek V3.2 has a GPQA Diamond result, 80.3%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only DeepSeek V3.2 has a AIME result, 84.6%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only DeepSeek V3.2 has a MMLU Pro result, 84.9%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only DeepSeek V3.2 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1175.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2 takes 164K tokens against 8K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2 $0.0007, Gemma 2 27B $0.0010 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only DeepSeek V3.2 has the number, $0.99.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- DeepSeek V3.2 30.0 from 3 benchmarks, Gemma 2 27B not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Reasoning, 41.1 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- LMArena Text: expert: DeepSeek V3.2 1436 against Gemma 2 27B 1171, 44.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- DeepSeek V3.2 $0.88 against Gemma 2 27B $0.65 per million output tokens, 1.4x apart.
- Context window
- DeepSeek V3.2 takes 164K tokens, Gemma 2 27B 8K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | DeepSeek V3.2 | Bars | Gemma 2 27B | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 2 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 3 | 0 | ||
| Math | 2 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 5 | 0 | ||
| General | 19 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 32 | 0 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | Gemma 2 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 70.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 59.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1362 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| AA Coding Index | 44.2 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 80.7% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 67.6% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 5.1% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 86.2% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 35.6% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| Terminal-Bench | 39.6% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1453 | 1211 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1449 | 1228 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1350 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1371 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | Gemma 2 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 21.5 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.1 | 122.1 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | Gemma 2 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 90.6% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| APEX-Agents | 21.3% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $1,034 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | Gemma 2 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 80.3% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 84.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 24.6% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 36.5% | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| ARC-AGI | 57.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1434 | 1198 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1436 | 1171 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1446 | 1206 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | Gemma 2 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 84.6% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 86.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| AA Math Index | 92.0 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 92.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 1.4% | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| MATH level 5 | Not measured | 27.9% | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1435 | 1212 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1440 | 1221 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | Gemma 2 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 84.9% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 76.1% | 68.0% | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 55.4% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 51.0% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 68.2% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 93.9% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 86.2% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| MMLU | Not measured | 75.7% | Only Gemma 2 27B measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1446 | 1228 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1440 | 1198 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1425 | 1241 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1410 | 1208 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | Gemma 2 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1175 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1149 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1131 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1158 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1133 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1164 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1032 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1082 | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index190
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | Gemma 2 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 60.7% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 73.3% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| DTBench | 85.6% | 48.0% | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| LMCA | 28.8% | 7.1% | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| CL-bench | 12.4% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| CL-bench Life | 7.4% | Not measured | Only DeepSeek V3.2 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1425 | 1231 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1413 | 1206 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1400 | 1240 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1439 | 1242 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1409 | 1217 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1455 | 1221 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1413 | 1209 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1374 | 1175 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1370 | 1174 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1429 | 1248 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1424 | 1228 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1424 | 1234 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1419 | 1277 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1427 | 1224 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1428 | 1230 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1407 | 1249 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1395 | 1212 | DeepSeek V3.2 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | DeepSeek V3.2 | Gemma 2 27B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | DeepSeek V3.2 | Google Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | DeepSeek | |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | December 1, 2025 | July 13, 2024 |
| Context window | 164K | 8K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.29 | $0.65 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.88 | $0.65 |
| Coding index | 30.0 | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 3 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.99 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is DeepSeek V3.2 better than Gemma 2 27B for coding?
Only DeepSeek V3.2 has a coding score, 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Gemma 2 27B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Gemma 2 27B has the edge where output tokens cost 1.4x less.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 or Gemma 2 27B?
DeepSeek V3.2 costs $0.29 per million input tokens and $0.88 per million output tokens; Gemma 2 27B costs $0.65 and $0.65. Cost per solved task is known for DeepSeek V3.2 only.
Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 or Gemma 2 27B?
DeepSeek V3.2, with 164K tokens against 8K.
How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.2 vs Gemma 2 27B comparison based on?
32 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V3.2's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Gemma 2 27B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.