Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.2 vs Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

DeepSeek V3.2 costs 2.8x less per output token than Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) ($0.88 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

DeepSeek V3.2DeepSeek
Coding
30.0
Overall
37.9
Output $/M
$0.88
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Google
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.50
vs $0.88 vs $2.50 per 1M output tokens. DeepSeek V3.2 is 2.8x cheaper.

DeepSeek V3.2 or Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): which to pick

Only DeepSeek V3.2 has a coding score, 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. DeepSeek V3.2 has results on SWE-bench Verified, SWE-bench Multilingual and LMArena WebDev; Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) on Design Arena: images, Design Arena: graphic design and Design Arena: logos. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.2 30.0 from 3 benchmarks, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.2 $0.88 against Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) $2.50 per million output tokens, 2.8x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.2 takes 164K tokens, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) 33K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index14 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Leader
SWE-bench Verified70.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual59.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena WebDev1362Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
AA Coding Index44.2Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)80.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)67.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)5.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)86.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)35.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Terminal-Bench39.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: coding1453Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1449Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1350Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1371Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Leader
AA Intelligence Index21.5Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index146.1Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom90.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
APEX-Agents21.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Vending-Bench 2$1,034Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Leader
GPQA Diamond80.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)24.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
ARC-AGI57.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
ARC-AGI-24.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1434Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: expert1436Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1446Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Leader
AIME84.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)86.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
AA Math Index92.0Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)92.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: math1435Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1440Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Leader
MMLU Pro84.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)76.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)55.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)51.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)68.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)93.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)86.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: science1446Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1440Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1425Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1410Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Leader
Design Arena: websites1175Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: UI components1149Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: game dev1132Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: data viz1158Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: 3D1133Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1164Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: SVG1032Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1083Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23 boards measured
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Leader
IFBench60.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)73.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
DTBench85.6%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMCA28.8%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
CL-bench12.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
CL-bench Life7.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text1425Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1413Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1400Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: English1439Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1409Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1455Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: German1413Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1374Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1370Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: French1429Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1424Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1424Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1419Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1427Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1428Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1407Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1395Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
Image generationDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 and Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Leader
Design Arena: imagesNot measured1179Only Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) measured
Design Arena: graphic designNot measured1151Only Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) measured
Design Arena: logosNot measured1169Only Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2$0.0007Fits in one request
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)$0.0015Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2$0.017Fits in one request
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)$0.022Exceeds the context window

DeepSeek V3.2 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2$0.067Exceeds the context window
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)$0.085Exceeds the context window

DeepSeek V3.2 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.2 and Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.2Google Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
MakerDeepSeekGoogle
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 1, 2025October 7, 2025
Context window164K33K
Input $/Mtok$0.29$0.30
Output $/Mtok$0.88$2.50
Coding index30.0Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$0.99Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.2 better than Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) for coding?

Only DeepSeek V3.2 has a coding score, 30.0 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 or Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)?

DeepSeek V3.2 costs $0.29 per million input tokens and $0.88 per million output tokens; Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) costs $0.30 and $2.50. Cost per solved task is known for DeepSeek V3.2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 or Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)?

DeepSeek V3.2, with 164K tokens against 33K.

Has any benchmark tested both DeepSeek V3.2 and Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)?

No benchmark has tested both yet. DeepSeek V3.2 has results on SWE-bench Verified, SWE-bench Multilingual and LMArena WebDev; Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) on Design Arena: images, Design Arena: graphic design and Design Arena: logos. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next