Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Mistral Large

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp leads Mistral Large on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 16.6 to 5.8, and DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs 14.6x less per output token ($0.41 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 35 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
16.6
Output $/M
$0.41
35
Mistral LargeMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
5.8
Output $/M
$6.00
0
vs boards won of 35 shared

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Mistral Large: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for output tokens 14.6x cheaper ($0.41 vs $6.00 per million) and a larger context window (164K against 128K tokens).

Shared results
35
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp only
22
Mistral Large only
9
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp not benchmarked, Mistral Large not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 38.5 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run): DeepSeek V3.2 Exp 78.9% against Mistral Large 17.8%, 61.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp $0.41 against Mistral Large $6.00 per million output tokens, 14.6x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp takes 164K tokens, Mistral Large 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.2 ExpBarsMistral LargeTies
Coding30
Intelligence20
Reasoning50
Math20
Knowledge50
General180
All shared boards350
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index30
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Mistral Large
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMistral LargeLeader
Aider polyglot74.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena WebDev1272Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured37.1%Only Mistral Large measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)78.9%17.8%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
WeirdML39.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: coding14381275DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: software and IT14381274DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena WebDev: HTML1281Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Mistral Large
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMistral LargeLeader
AA Intelligence Index16.65.8DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Epoch Capabilities Index144.9122.1DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Mistral Large
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMistral LargeLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom33.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
TheAgentCompany42.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Mistral Large
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMistral LargeLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured47.7%Only Mistral Large measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.7%35.1%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)14.9%3.5%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: hard prompts14291257DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: expert14221208DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14441268DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Mistral Large
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMistral LargeLeader
AIMENot measured9.2%Only Mistral Large measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured74.4%Only Mistral Large measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured87.2%Only Mistral Large measured
AA Math Index87.7Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: math14221261DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: mathematical work14331257DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Mistral Large
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMistral LargeLeader
MMLU ProNot measured69.7%Only Mistral Large measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured63.8%Only Mistral Large measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured76.2%Only Mistral Large measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.0%51.5%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
MMLUNot measured68.8%Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: science14431260DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14681255DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: legal and government14191275DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: business and finance14121238DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Mistral Large
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMistral LargeLeader
Design Arena: websites1179Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: UI components1167Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: game dev1144Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: data viz1152Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: 3D1148Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: all code categories1171Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: SVG1032Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index180
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Mistral Large
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMistral LargeLeader
IFBench54.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
DTBench87.7%60.8%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMCA29.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench13.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench Life9.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text14251265DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: instruction following14011249DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: creative writing14041242DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: English14411284DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: non-English14041235DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: Chinese14611239DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: German14401242DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: Japanese13311170DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: Korean13721202DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: French14341325DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: Spanish14411268DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: Russian14121252DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: Polish14351157DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: multi-turn14221260DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: longer queries14181261DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: writing and language14071261DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14071230DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Mistral Large
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMistral LargeLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.0005Fits in one request
Mistral Large$0.0050Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.015Fits in one request
Mistral Large$0.118Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.058Exceeds the context window
Mistral Large$0.460Exceeds the context window

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and Mistral Large
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.2 ExpMistral Large
MakerDeepSeekMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2025February 26, 2024
Context window164K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.27$2.00
Output $/Mtok$0.41$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.2 Exp better than Mistral Large for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for output tokens 14.6x cheaper ($0.41 vs $6.00 per million) and a larger context window (164K against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Mistral Large?

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs $0.27 per million input tokens and $0.41 per million output tokens; Mistral Large costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or Mistral Large?

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp, with 164K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs Mistral Large comparison based on?

35 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Mistral Large's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next