Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs GPT-4o (2024-11-20)

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp leads GPT-4o (2024-11-20) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 16.6 to 8.4, and DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs 24.4x less per output token ($0.41 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.2 ExpDeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.41
4
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
0
vs boards won of 4 shared

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or GPT-4o (2024-11-20): which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for output tokens 24.4x cheaper ($0.41 vs $10.00 per million) and a larger context window (164K against 128K tokens).

Shared results
4
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp only
56
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) only
20
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp not benchmarked, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 35.2 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Aider polyglot: DeepSeek V3.2 Exp 74.2% against GPT-4o (2024-11-20) 18.2%, 56.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp $0.41 against GPT-4o (2024-11-20) $10.00 per million output tokens, 24.4x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp takes 164K tokens, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.2 ExpBarsGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Ties
Coding20
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
All shared boards40
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
Aider polyglot74.2%18.2%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
LMArena WebDev1272Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured43.4%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)78.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
GSO-BenchNot measured0.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
WeirdML39.5%25.1%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
CybenchNot measured12.5%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: coding1438Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1438Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1281Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
AA Intelligence Index16.68.4DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Epoch Capabilities Index144.9Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom33.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
TheAgentCompany42.9%8.6%DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)56.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured53.8%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured62.2%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)14.9%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured47.9%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
VPCTNot measured40.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1429Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: expert1422Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1444Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
AIMENot measured11.9%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured74.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured90.4%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
AA Math Index87.7Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured6.3%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MATH level 5Not measured49.8%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: math1422Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1433Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
MathArena14.4%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
MMLU ProNot measured72.6%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured59.7%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured45.9%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.5%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured57.4%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)85.0%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
GeoBenchNot measured71.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena Text: science1443Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1468Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1419Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1412Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
Design Arena: websites1179Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: UI components1164Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: game dev1143Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: data viz1152Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: 3D1148Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: all code categories1170Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Design Arena: SVG1031Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index25 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
IFBench54.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
DTBench87.7%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMCA29.1%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Fiction.LiveBench83.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured81.8%Only GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
CL-bench13.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
CL-bench Life9.5%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text1425Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1401Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1404Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: English1441Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: non-English1404Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1461Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: German1440Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1331Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Korean1372Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: French1434Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1441Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Russian1412Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: Polish1435Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1422Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1418Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1407Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1407Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.2 Exp measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.2 ExpGPT-4o (2024-11-20)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.0005Fits in one request
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.0075Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.015Fits in one request
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.155Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp$0.058Exceeds the context window
GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.600Exceeds the context window

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.2 Exp and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.2 ExpOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-11-20)
MakerDeepSeekOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 29, 2025November 20, 2024
Context window164K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.27$2.50
Output $/Mtok$0.41$10.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.2 Exp better than GPT-4o (2024-11-20) for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3.2 Exp for output tokens 24.4x cheaper ($0.41 vs $10.00 per million) and a larger context window (164K against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or GPT-4o (2024-11-20)?

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp costs $0.27 per million input tokens and $0.41 per million output tokens; GPT-4o (2024-11-20) costs $2.50 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 Exp or GPT-4o (2024-11-20)?

DeepSeek V3.2 Exp, with 164K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.2 Exp vs GPT-4o (2024-11-20) comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. DeepSeek V3.2 Exp's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-4o (2024-11-20)'s on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next