Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Mistral Large

DeepSeek V3.1 leads Mistral Large on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 13.7 to 5.8, and DeepSeek V3.1 costs 4.0x less per output token ($1.50 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 2 benchmarks have a result for both.

DeepSeek V3.1DeepSeek
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
2
Mistral LargeMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$6.00
0
vs boards won of 2 shared

DeepSeek V3.1 or Mistral Large: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick DeepSeek V3.1 for output tokens 4.0x cheaper ($1.50 vs $6.00 per million) and a larger context window (164K against 128K tokens).

Shared results
2
DeepSeek V3.1 only
9
Mistral Large only
42
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
DeepSeek V3.1 not benchmarked, Mistral Large not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 21.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
DTBench: DeepSeek V3.1 82.7% against Mistral Large 60.8%, 21.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
DeepSeek V3.1 $1.50 against Mistral Large $6.00 per million output tokens, 4.0x apart.
Context window
DeepSeek V3.1 takes 164K tokens, Mistral Large 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryDeepSeek V3.1BarsMistral LargeTies
Intelligence10
General10
All shared boards20
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Mistral Large
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Mistral LargeLeader
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured37.1%Only Mistral Large measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured17.8%Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1275Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1274Only Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Mistral Large
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Mistral LargeLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.75.8DeepSeek V3.1
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured122.1Only Mistral Large measured
Agentic workNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Mistral Large
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Mistral LargeLeader
Neither model has a result on 41 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Mistral Large
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Mistral LargeLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured47.7%Only Mistral Large measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured35.1%Only Mistral Large measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.5%Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1257Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1208Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1268Only Mistral Large measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.2%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Mistral Large
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Mistral LargeLeader
AIMENot measured9.2%Only Mistral Large measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured74.4%Only Mistral Large measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured87.2%Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1261Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1257Only Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Mistral Large
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Mistral LargeLeader
MMLU ProNot measured69.7%Only Mistral Large measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured63.8%Only Mistral Large measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured76.2%Only Mistral Large measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured51.5%Only Mistral Large measured
MMLUNot measured68.8%Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1260Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1255Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1275Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1238Only Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Mistral Large
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Mistral LargeLeader
Design Arena: websites1123Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Design Arena: UI components1085Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Design Arena: game dev1084Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Design Arena: data viz1095Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Design Arena: 3D1077Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1112Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Design Arena: SVG967Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Mistral Large
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Mistral LargeLeader
DTBench82.7%60.8%DeepSeek V3.1
LMCA24.3%Not measuredOnly DeepSeek V3.1 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1265Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1249Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1242Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1284Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1235Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1239Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1242Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1170Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1202Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1325Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1268Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1252Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1157Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1260Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1261Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1261Only Mistral Large measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1230Only Mistral Large measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for DeepSeek V3.1 and Mistral Large
BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Mistral LargeLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1$0.0013Fits in one request
Mistral Large$0.0050Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1$0.032Fits in one request
Mistral Large$0.118Fits in one request

DeepSeek V3.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

DeepSeek V3.1$0.125Exceeds the context window
Mistral Large$0.460Exceeds the context window

DeepSeek V3.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of DeepSeek V3.1 and Mistral Large
SpecificationDeepSeek V3.1Mistral Large
MakerDeepSeekMistral AI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 21, 2025February 26, 2024
Context window164K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.55$2.00
Output $/Mtok$1.50$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.1 better than Mistral Large for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick DeepSeek V3.1 for output tokens 4.0x cheaper ($1.50 vs $6.00 per million) and a larger context window (164K against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 or Mistral Large?

DeepSeek V3.1 costs $0.55 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Mistral Large costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.1 or Mistral Large?

DeepSeek V3.1, with 164K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the DeepSeek V3.1 vs Mistral Large comparison based on?

2 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. DeepSeek V3.1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Large's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next