Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command R+ (08-2024) vs GPT-4.1

GPT-4.1 costs 1.3x less per output token than Command R+ (08-2024) ($8.00 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Command R+ (08-2024)Cohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
GPT-4.1OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
12.7
Output $/M
$8.00
vs $10.00 vs $8.00 per 1M output tokens. GPT-4.1 is 1.3x cheaper.

Command R+ (08-2024) or GPT-4.1: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Command R+ (08-2024) has none yet; GPT-4.1 on Aider polyglot, SWE-bench Verified and SWE-bench Multimodal. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command R+ (08-2024) not benchmarked, GPT-4.1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Command R+ (08-2024) $10.00 against GPT-4.1 $8.00 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
Command R+ (08-2024) takes 128K tokens, GPT-4.1 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Command R+ (08-2024) and GPT-4.1
BenchmarkCommand R+ (08-2024)GPT-4.1Leader
Aider polyglotNot measured52.4%Only GPT-4.1 measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured39.6%Only GPT-4.1 measured
SWE-bench MultimodalNot measured31.1%Only GPT-4.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured54.7%Only GPT-4.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured45.7%Only GPT-4.1 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured13.6%Only GPT-4.1 measured
WeirdMLNot measured39.0%Only GPT-4.1 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured558.1Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1390Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1391Only GPT-4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Command R+ (08-2024) and GPT-4.1
BenchmarkCommand R+ (08-2024)GPT-4.1Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured12.7Only GPT-4.1 measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured136.7Only GPT-4.1 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Command R+ (08-2024) and GPT-4.1
BenchmarkCommand R+ (08-2024)GPT-4.1Leader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured47.1%Only GPT-4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Command R+ (08-2024) and GPT-4.1
BenchmarkCommand R+ (08-2024)GPT-4.1Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured65.4%Only GPT-4.1 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured72.4%Only GPT-4.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured66.6%Only GPT-4.1 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured4.2%Only GPT-4.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured66.9%Only GPT-4.1 measured
ARC-AGINot measured5.5%Only GPT-4.1 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured0.4%Only GPT-4.1 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured27.0%Only GPT-4.1 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured3.0%Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1384Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1364Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1393Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1215Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1248Only GPT-4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Command R+ (08-2024) and GPT-4.1
BenchmarkCommand R+ (08-2024)GPT-4.1Leader
AIMENot measured39.6%Only GPT-4.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured87.2%Only GPT-4.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured87.7%Only GPT-4.1 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured34.7Only GPT-4.1 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured34.7%Only GPT-4.1 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured38.3%Only GPT-4.1 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured6.0%Only GPT-4.1 measured
MATH level 5Not measured83.0%Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1369Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1360Only GPT-4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Command R+ (08-2024) and GPT-4.1
BenchmarkCommand R+ (08-2024)GPT-4.1Leader
MMLU ProNot measured80.5%Only GPT-4.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.1%Only GPT-4.1 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured69.9%Only GPT-4.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured63.0%Only GPT-4.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured75.1%Only GPT-4.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured65.9%Only GPT-4.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured91.2%Only GPT-4.1 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.6%Only GPT-4.1 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured31.1%Only GPT-4.1 measured
GeoBenchNot measured72.0%Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1382Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1379Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1399Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1369Only GPT-4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Command R+ (08-2024) and GPT-4.1
BenchmarkCommand R+ (08-2024)GPT-4.1Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1039Only GPT-4.1 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1000Only GPT-4.1 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1080Only GPT-4.1 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1104Only GPT-4.1 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured850Only GPT-4.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1026Only GPT-4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30 boards measured
General benchmarks for Command R+ (08-2024) and GPT-4.1
BenchmarkCommand R+ (08-2024)GPT-4.1Leader
IFBenchNot measured43.0%Only GPT-4.1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured68.3%Only GPT-4.1 measured
DTBenchNot measured68.3%Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMCANot measured25.6%Only GPT-4.1 measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured63.9%Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1383Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1367Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1363Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1210Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1392Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1370Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1382Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1381Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1319Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1338Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1382Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1376Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1377Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1389Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1397Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1385Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1371Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1365Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1209Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1226Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1218Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1196Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1207Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1208Only GPT-4.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1210Only GPT-4.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command R+ (08-2024)$0.0075Fits in one request
GPT-4.1$0.0060Fits in one request

GPT-4.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command R+ (08-2024)$0.155Fits in one request
GPT-4.1$0.124Fits in one request

GPT-4.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command R+ (08-2024)$0.600Exceeds the context window
GPT-4.1$0.480Fits in one request

GPT-4.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command R+ (08-2024) and GPT-4.1
SpecificationCohere Command R+ (08-2024)OpenAI GPT-4.1
MakerCohereOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 30, 2024April 14, 2025
Context window128K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.50$2.00
Output $/Mtok$10.00$8.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.37
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command R+ (08-2024) better than GPT-4.1 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Command R+ (08-2024) or GPT-4.1?

Command R+ (08-2024) costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; GPT-4.1 costs $2.00 and $8.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-4.1 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Command R+ (08-2024) or GPT-4.1?

GPT-4.1, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both Command R+ (08-2024) and GPT-4.1?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Command R+ (08-2024) has none yet; GPT-4.1 on Aider polyglot, SWE-bench Verified and SWE-bench Multimodal. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next