Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Command A+ vs GPT-4.1 Mini

Updated October 21, 2026. 0 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Command A+Cohere
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
GPT-4.1 MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
10.2
Output $/M
$1.60
vs $1.50 vs $1.60 per 1M output tokens. Command A+ is 1.1x cheaper.

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Command A+ has the edge where output tokens cost 1.1x less.

Shared results
0
Command A+ only
0
GPT-4.1 Mini only
84
Like-for-like categories
0 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Command A+ not benchmarked, GPT-4.1 Mini not benchmarked.
Widest category
No category has a result for both models.
Widest single gap
No benchmark has a result for both models.
Output price
Command A+ $1.50 against GPT-4.1 Mini $1.60 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
Command A+ takes 192K tokens, GPT-4.1 Mini 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index9 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Command A+ and GPT-4.1 Mini
BenchmarkCommand A+GPT-4.1 MiniLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured32.4%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured23.9%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured20.2Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured58.2%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured48.3%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured7.6%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
WeirdMLNot measured37.6%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1367Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1360Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Command A+ and GPT-4.1 Mini
BenchmarkCommand A+GPT-4.1 MiniLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured10.2Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured134.9Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Command A+ and GPT-4.1 Mini
BenchmarkCommand A+GPT-4.1 MiniLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured52.9%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Command A+ and GPT-4.1 Mini
BenchmarkCommand A+GPT-4.1 MiniLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured67.9%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured70.5%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured66.4%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured5.0%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured65.8%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
ARC-AGINot measured3.5%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured0.0%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured1.0%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured7.0%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1349Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1338Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1362Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1182Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1214Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Command A+ and GPT-4.1 Mini
BenchmarkCommand A+GPT-4.1 MiniLeader
AIMENot measured49.4%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured88.0%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured87.8%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
AA Math IndexNot measured46.3Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured46.3%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured44.7%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured6.7%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MATH level 5Not measured87.3%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1343Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1347Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Command A+ and GPT-4.1 Mini
BenchmarkCommand A+GPT-4.1 MiniLeader
MMLU ProNot measured77.2%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured78.0%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured57.9%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured71.9%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured65.5%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured84.6%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.1%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured12.7%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1328Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1324Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1343Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1322Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Command A+ and GPT-4.1 Mini
BenchmarkCommand A+GPT-4.1 MiniLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured997Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured961Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1071Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1034Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured837Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured994Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Command A+ and GPT-4.1 Mini
BenchmarkCommand A+GPT-4.1 MiniLeader
IFBenchNot measured38.3%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured44.0%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
DTBenchNot measured68.8%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMCANot measured21.1%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured44.4%Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena TextNot measured1341Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1333Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1299Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1181Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1356Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1318Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1329Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1350Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1290Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1298Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1358Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1319Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1324Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1326Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1354Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1344Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1319Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1300Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1191Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1186Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1188Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1182Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1174Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1187Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1182Only GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Command A+ and GPT-4.1 Mini
BenchmarkCommand A+GPT-4.1 MiniLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Command A+$0.0010Fits in one request
GPT-4.1 Mini$0.0012Fits in one request

Command A+ costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Command A+$0.019Fits in one request
GPT-4.1 Mini$0.025Fits in one request

Command A+ costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Command A+$0.075Exceeds the context window
GPT-4.1 Mini$0.096Fits in one request

Command A+ costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Command A+ and GPT-4.1 Mini
SpecificationCohere Command A+OpenAI GPT-4.1 Mini
MakerCohereOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 22, 2026April 14, 2025
Context window192K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.40
Output $/Mtok$1.50$1.60
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.818
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Command A+ better than GPT-4.1 Mini for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Command A+ has the edge where output tokens cost 1.1x less.

Which is cheaper, Command A+ or GPT-4.1 Mini?

Command A+ costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; GPT-4.1 Mini costs $0.40 and $1.60. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-4.1 Mini only.

Which has the bigger context window, Command A+ or GPT-4.1 Mini?

GPT-4.1 Mini, with 1.05M tokens against 192K.

How many benchmarks is the Command A+ vs GPT-4.1 Mini comparison based on?

0 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Command A+'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GPT-4.1 Mini's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next