Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Trinity Large Thinking vs gpt-oss-120b

gpt-oss-120b leads Trinity Large Thinking on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 11.6 to 10.8, and gpt-oss-120b costs 1.6x less per output token ($0.50 vs $0.80 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 47 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace Trinity Large Thinking Replace gpt-oss-120b
Trinity Large ThinkingArcee AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.80
16
gpt-oss-120bOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
50.0
Output $/M
$0.50
31
vs boards won of 47 shared

Trinity Large Thinking or gpt-oss-120b: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Trinity Large Thinking for a larger context window (262K against 131K tokens) and work measured by AA Coding Index or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Model ATrinity Large ThinkingArcee AINot benchmarked1 independent benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel Bgpt-oss-120bOpenAINot benchmarked1 independent benchmark$0.51 per solved task
Shared results
47
Trinity Large Thinking only
5
gpt-oss-120b only
34
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Trinity Large Thinking not benchmarked, gpt-oss-120b not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 17.1 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Trinity Large Thinking 90.1% against gpt-oss-120b 65.8%, 24.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Trinity Large Thinking $0.80 against gpt-oss-120b $0.50 per million output tokens, 1.6x apart.
Context window
Trinity Large Thinking takes 262K tokens, gpt-oss-120b 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryTrinity Large ThinkingBarsgpt-oss-120bTies
Coding14
Intelligence01
Agentic work11
Reasoning14
Math02
Knowledge15
Web design60
General614
All shared boards1631
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index14
Coding benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and gpt-oss-120b
BenchmarkTrinity Large Thinkinggpt-oss-120bLeader
Aider polyglotNot measured41.8%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured26.0%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
LMArena WebDev1238Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
AA Coding Index25.830.4gpt-oss-120b
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.2%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured33.6%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured87.8%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
SciCode40.6%34.0%Trinity Large Thinking
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)22.7%23.5%gpt-oss-120b
Terminal-BenchNot measured18.7%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
WeirdMLNot measured48.2%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
ALE-BenchNot measured575.6Only gpt-oss-120b measured
LMArena Text: coding13571379gpt-oss-120b
LMArena Text: software and IT13621387gpt-oss-120b
LMArena WebDev: React1231Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1240Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
SciCodeNot measured7.7%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and gpt-oss-120b
BenchmarkTrinity Large Thinkinggpt-oss-120bLeader
AA Intelligence Index10.811.6gpt-oss-120b
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured139.8Only gpt-oss-120b measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Agentic work benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and gpt-oss-120b
BenchmarkTrinity Large Thinkinggpt-oss-120bLeader
AA Agentic Index1.03.7gpt-oss-120b
τ²-Bench Telecom90.1%65.8%Trinity Large Thinking
APEX-AgentsNot measured4.4%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
METR time horizonsNot measured56.6%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured-$22Only gpt-oss-120b measured
BrowseComp-PlusNot measured67.0%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14
Reasoning benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and gpt-oss-120b
BenchmarkTrinity Large Thinkinggpt-oss-120bLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured78.5%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)75.2%78.2%gpt-oss-120b
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)15.8%19.6%gpt-oss-120b
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured75.8%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
SimpleBenchNot measured22.1%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured2.0%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13421364gpt-oss-120b
LMArena Text: expert13591356Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13561368gpt-oss-120b
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured58.6%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and gpt-oss-120b
BenchmarkTrinity Large Thinkinggpt-oss-120bLeader
AIMENot measured92.6%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured94.8%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured92.0%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
AA Math IndexNot measured93.4Only gpt-oss-120b measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured93.4%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured88.9%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
LMArena Text: math13651389gpt-oss-120b
LMArena Text: mathematical work13501386gpt-oss-120b
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15
Knowledge benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and gpt-oss-120b
BenchmarkTrinity Large Thinkinggpt-oss-120bLeader
MMLU ProNot measured79.2%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured75.9%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)57.9%48.8%Trinity Large Thinking
CorpFin (Vals AI)54.7%58.2%gpt-oss-120b
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured71.6%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured91.4%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured80.8%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
LMArena Text: science13551382gpt-oss-120b
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13491388gpt-oss-120b
LMArena Text: legal and government13451355gpt-oss-120b
LMArena Text: business and finance13291359gpt-oss-120b
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and gpt-oss-120b
BenchmarkTrinity Large Thinkinggpt-oss-120bLeader
Design Arena: websites1137967Trinity Large Thinking
Design Arena: UI components1042924Trinity Large Thinking
Design Arena: game dev1078992Trinity Large Thinking
Design Arena: data viz1098987Trinity Large Thinking
Design Arena: 3D1081901Trinity Large Thinking
Design Arena: all code categories1117962Trinity Large Thinking
Design Arena: SVG1016Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1041Not measuredOnly Trinity Large Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index614
General benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and gpt-oss-120b
BenchmarkTrinity Large Thinkinggpt-oss-120bLeader
IFBench56.3%69.0%gpt-oss-120b
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)38.0%52.0%gpt-oss-120b
DTBenchNot measured76.3%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
LMCANot measured22.1%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured44.4%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured77.1%Only gpt-oss-120b measured
Surface Evolver Bench15.6%25.0%gpt-oss-120b
LMArena Text13401366gpt-oss-120b
LMArena Text: instruction following13261318Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Text: creative writing13081274Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Text: English13561375gpt-oss-120b
LMArena Text: non-English13251351gpt-oss-120b
LMArena Text: Chinese13711385gpt-oss-120b
LMArena Text: German13561353Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Text: Japanese13121331gpt-oss-120b
LMArena Text: Korean13061282Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Text: French13661370gpt-oss-120b
LMArena Text: Spanish13271389gpt-oss-120b
LMArena Text: Russian13381343gpt-oss-120b
LMArena Text: Polish13121353gpt-oss-120b
LMArena Text: multi-turn13201340gpt-oss-120b
LMArena Text: longer queries13181319gpt-oss-120b
LMArena Text: writing and language13171306Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12961292Trinity Large Thinking
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Trinity Large Thinking and gpt-oss-120b
BenchmarkTrinity Large Thinkinggpt-oss-120bLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Trinity Large Thinking$0.0006Fits in one request
gpt-oss-120b$0.0003Fits in one request

gpt-oss-120b costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Trinity Large Thinking$0.015Fits in one request
gpt-oss-120b$0.0065Fits in one request

gpt-oss-120b costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Trinity Large Thinking$0.058Fits in one request
gpt-oss-120b$0.025Exceeds the context window

gpt-oss-120b costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Trinity Large Thinking and gpt-oss-120b
SpecificationArcee AI Trinity Large ThinkingOpenAI gpt-oss-120b
MakerArcee AIOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedApril 1, 2026August 5, 2025
Context window262K131K
Input $/Mtok$0.25$0.10
Output $/Mtok$0.80$0.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.51
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Trinity Large Thinking better than gpt-oss-120b for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Trinity Large Thinking for a larger context window (262K against 131K tokens) and work measured by AA Coding Index or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Trinity Large Thinking or gpt-oss-120b?

Trinity Large Thinking costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; gpt-oss-120b costs $0.10 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for gpt-oss-120b only.

Which has the bigger context window, Trinity Large Thinking or gpt-oss-120b?

Trinity Large Thinking, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Trinity Large Thinking vs gpt-oss-120b comparison based on?

47 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Trinity Large Thinking's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and gpt-oss-120b's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next