Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova Premier 1.0 vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Kimi K2.7 Code leads Nova Premier 1.0 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 25.8 to 9.2, and Kimi K2.7 Code costs 3.1x less per output token ($4.00 vs $12.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 9 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nova Premier 1.0Amazon
Coding
No data
Overall
9.2
Output $/M
$12.50
0
Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI
Coding
53.4
Overall
25.8
Output $/M
$4.00
9
vs boards won of 9 shared

Nova Premier 1.0 or Kimi K2.7 Code: which to pick

Only Kimi K2.7 Code has a coding score, 53.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Premier 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nova Premier 1.0 for a larger context window (1M against 262K tokens).

Shared results
9
Nova Premier 1.0 only
4
Kimi K2.7 Code only
42
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova Premier 1.0 not benchmarked, Kimi K2.7 Code 53.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Web design, 53.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: websites: Nova Premier 1.0 835 against Kimi K2.7 Code 1264, 53.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova Premier 1.0 $12.50 against Kimi K2.7 Code $4.00 per million output tokens, 3.1x apart.
Context window
Nova Premier 1.0 takes 1M tokens, Kimi K2.7 Code 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova Premier 1.0BarsKimi K2.7 CodeTies
Coding02
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning02
Web design01
General02
All shared boards09
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1474Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured60.8Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured78.2%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.2%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured25.4%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured50.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)31.7%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
SciCodeNot measured47.8%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.8%44.7%Kimi K2.7 Code
FrontierCodeNot measured30.1%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
WeirdMLNot measured54.1%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
ALE-Bench147.4886.2Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1475Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1451Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1513Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
AA Intelligence Index9.225.8Kimi K2.7 Code
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured150.1Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured21.0Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1176Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1175Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1143Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1137Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1147Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1131Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1201Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1154Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
τ²-Bench Telecom38.3%90.1%Kimi K2.7 Code
APEX-AgentsNot measured37.6%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$5,083Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)56.9%89.6%Kimi K2.7 Code
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.2%35.0%Kimi K2.7 Code
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured87.9%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SimpleBenchNot measured57.9%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured14.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
AA Math Index17.3Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)17.3%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured95.6%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured54.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured12.2%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)73.3%Not measuredOnly Nova Premier 1.0 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured36.5%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Web design benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
Design Arena: websites8351264Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1259Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1220Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1227Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1241Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1253Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1176Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1196Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
IFBench36.2%63.1%Kimi K2.7 Code
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)34.3%79.3%Kimi K2.7 Code
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured48.8%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 43 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova Premier 1.0 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkNova Premier 1.0Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova Premier 1.0$0.0088Fits in one request
Kimi K2.7 Code$0.0029Fits in one request

Kimi K2.7 Code costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova Premier 1.0$0.163Fits in one request
Kimi K2.7 Code$0.059Fits in one request

Kimi K2.7 Code costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova Premier 1.0$0.625Fits in one request
Kimi K2.7 Code$0.230Fits in one request

Kimi K2.7 Code costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova Premier 1.0 and Kimi K2.7 Code
SpecificationAmazon Nova Premier 1.0MoonshotAI Kimi K2.7 Code
MakerAmazonMoonshot AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 31, 2025June 12, 2026
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.95
Output $/Mtok$12.50$4.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked53.4
Independent measurements behind it04
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.35
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova Premier 1.0 better than Kimi K2.7 Code for coding?

Only Kimi K2.7 Code has a coding score, 53.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Premier 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nova Premier 1.0 for a larger context window (1M against 262K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Nova Premier 1.0 or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Nova Premier 1.0 costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $12.50 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code costs $0.95 and $4.00. Cost per solved task is known for Kimi K2.7 Code only.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova Premier 1.0 or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Nova Premier 1.0, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Nova Premier 1.0 vs Kimi K2.7 Code comparison based on?

9 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Nova Premier 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Kimi K2.7 Code's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next