Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova Micro 1.0 vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Updated October 21, 2026. 7 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Nova Micro 1.0Amazon
Coding
No data
Overall
5.9
Output $/M
$0.14
0
Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI
Coding
53.4
Overall
25.8
Output $/M
$4.00
7
vs boards won of 7 shared

Decision reading

Only Kimi K2.7 Code has a coding score, 53.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Micro 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Nova Micro 1.0 has the edge where output tokens cost 28.6x less.

Shared results
7
Nova Micro 1.0 only
32
Kimi K2.7 Code only
44
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova Micro 1.0 not benchmarked, Kimi K2.7 Code 53.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 76.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Nova Micro 1.0 14.0% against Kimi K2.7 Code 90.1%, 76.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova Micro 1.0 $0.14 against Kimi K2.7 Code $4.00 per million output tokens, 28.6x apart.
Context window
Nova Micro 1.0 takes 128K tokens, Kimi K2.7 Code 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova Micro 1.0BarsKimi K2.7 CodeTies
Coding01
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning02
General02
All shared boards07
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1474Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured60.8Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured78.2%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.2%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured25.4%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured50.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)14.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
SciCodeNot measured47.8%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)1.5%44.7%Kimi K2.7 Code
FrontierCodeNot measured30.1%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
WeirdMLNot measured54.1%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
ALE-BenchNot measured886.2Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena Text: coding1218Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1215Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1475Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1451Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1513Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
AA Intelligence Index5.925.8Kimi K2.7 Code
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured150.1Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured21.0Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1176Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1175Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1143Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1143Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1147Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1131Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1201Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1154Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
τ²-Bench Telecom14.0%90.1%Kimi K2.7 Code
APEX-AgentsNot measured37.6%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$5,083Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)35.8%89.6%Kimi K2.7 Code
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.6%35.0%Kimi K2.7 Code
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured87.9%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SimpleBenchNot measured57.9%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured14.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1191Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: expert1183Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1203Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
AA Math Index6.0Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)6.0%Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured95.6%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured54.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured12.2%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena Text: math1206Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1212Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)53.1%Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured36.5%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
MMLU70.8%Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: science1210Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1207Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1221Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1182Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1264Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1259Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1220Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1227Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1241Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1253Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1176Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1196Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
IFBench29.4%63.1%Kimi K2.7 Code
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)13.0%79.3%Kimi K2.7 Code
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured48.8%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena Text1208Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1174Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1172Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: English1224Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1186Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1209Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: German1192Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1154Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1150Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: French1238Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1225Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1185Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1178Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1205Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1192Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1163Not measuredOnly Nova Micro 1.0 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova Micro 1.0 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkNova Micro 1.0Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova Micro 1.0$0.0001Fits in one request
Kimi K2.7 Code$0.0029Fits in one request

Nova Micro 1.0 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova Micro 1.0$0.0022Fits in one request
Kimi K2.7 Code$0.059Fits in one request

Nova Micro 1.0 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova Micro 1.0$0.0084Exceeds the context window
Kimi K2.7 Code$0.230Fits in one request

Nova Micro 1.0 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova Micro 1.0 and Kimi K2.7 Code
SpecificationAmazon Nova Micro 1.0MoonshotAI Kimi K2.7 Code
MakerAmazonMoonshot AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 5, 2024June 12, 2026
Context window128K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.035$0.95
Output $/Mtok$0.14$4.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked53.4
Independent measurements behind it04
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.35
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova Micro 1.0 better than Kimi K2.7 Code for coding?

Only Kimi K2.7 Code has a coding score, 53.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova Micro 1.0 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Nova Micro 1.0 has the edge where output tokens cost 28.6x less.

Which is cheaper, Nova Micro 1.0 or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Nova Micro 1.0 costs $0.035 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code costs $0.95 and $4.00. Cost per solved task is known for Kimi K2.7 Code only.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova Micro 1.0 or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Nova Micro 1.0 vs Kimi K2.7 Code comparison based on?

7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Nova Micro 1.0's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Kimi K2.7 Code's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next