Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nova 2 Lite vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Updated October 21, 2026. 3 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Nova 2 LiteAmazon
Coding
No data
Overall
13.4
Output $/M
$2.50
0
Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI
Coding
53.4
Overall
25.8
Output $/M
$4.00
3
vs boards won of 3 shared

Decision reading

Only Kimi K2.7 Code has a coding score, 53.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova 2 Lite has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Nova 2 Lite has the edge where output tokens cost 1.6x less, and where the context window is larger, 1M against 262K tokens.

Shared results
3
Nova 2 Lite only
28
Kimi K2.7 Code only
48
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nova 2 Lite not benchmarked, Kimi K2.7 Code 53.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 29.7 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Coding Index: Nova 2 Lite 23.0 against Kimi K2.7 Code 60.8, 37.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nova 2 Lite $2.50 against Kimi K2.7 Code $4.00 per million output tokens, 1.6x apart.
Context window
Nova 2 Lite takes 1M tokens, Kimi K2.7 Code 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNova 2 LiteBarsKimi K2.7 CodeTies
Coding02
Intelligence01
All shared boards03
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1474Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
AA Coding Index23.060.8Kimi K2.7 Code
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured78.2%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.2%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured25.4%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured67.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured50.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SciCodeNot measured47.8%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured44.7%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
FrontierCodeNot measured30.1%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
WeirdMLNot measured54.1%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
ALE-Bench236.3886.2Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Text: coding1385Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1394Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1475Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1451Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1513Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
AA Intelligence Index13.425.8Kimi K2.7 Code
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured150.1Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured21.0Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1176Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1175Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1143Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1143Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1147Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1131Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1201Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1154Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured90.1%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured37.6%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$5,083Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured89.6%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured35.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured87.9%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
SimpleBenchNot measured57.9%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured14.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1364Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: expert1359Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1385Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured95.6%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured54.0%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured12.2%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena Text: math1359Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1369Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured36.5%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena Text: science1382Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1386Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1359Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1369Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1264Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1259Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1220Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1227Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1241Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1253Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1176Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1196Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
IFBenchNot measured63.1%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured79.3%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured48.8%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena Text1362Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1335Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1292Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: English1385Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: non-English1337Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1364Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: German1343Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1273Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: Korean1281Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: French1381Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1375Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: Russian1342Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: Polish1327Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1338Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1335Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1318Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1309Not measuredOnly Nova 2 Lite measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nova 2 Lite and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteKimi K2.7 CodeLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nova 2 Lite$0.0015Fits in one request
Kimi K2.7 Code$0.0029Fits in one request

Nova 2 Lite costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nova 2 Lite$0.022Fits in one request
Kimi K2.7 Code$0.059Fits in one request

Nova 2 Lite costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nova 2 Lite$0.085Fits in one request
Kimi K2.7 Code$0.230Fits in one request

Nova 2 Lite costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nova 2 Lite and Kimi K2.7 Code
SpecificationAmazon Nova 2 LiteMoonshotAI Kimi K2.7 Code
MakerAmazonMoonshot AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 2, 2025June 12, 2026
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.30$0.95
Output $/Mtok$2.50$4.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked53.4
Independent measurements behind it04
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.35
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nova 2 Lite better than Kimi K2.7 Code for coding?

Only Kimi K2.7 Code has a coding score, 53.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nova 2 Lite has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Nova 2 Lite has the edge where output tokens cost 1.6x less, and where the context window is larger, 1M against 262K tokens.

Which is cheaper, Nova 2 Lite or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Nova 2 Lite costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code costs $0.95 and $4.00. Cost per solved task is known for Kimi K2.7 Code only.

Which has the bigger context window, Nova 2 Lite or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Nova 2 Lite, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Nova 2 Lite vs Kimi K2.7 Code comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Nova 2 Lite's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Kimi K2.7 Code's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next