LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Hy3

Updated October 21, 2026. 24 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen
Coding
30.5
Overall
6.7
Output $/M
$1.00
0
Hy3Tencent
Coding
43.9
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.528
24
vs boards won of 24 shared

Decision reading

Pick Hy3 for coding: it scores 43.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 30.5 for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct, though on 1 benchmark against 2.

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Shared results
24
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct only
11
Hy3 only
20
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 30.5 from 2 benchmarks, Hy3 43.9 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Math, 38.5 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 41.7% against Hy3 89.7%, 48.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct $1.00 against Hy3 $0.528 per million output tokens, 1.9x apart.
Context window
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct takes 33K tokens, Hy3 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructBarsHy3Ties
Coding02
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General011
All shared boards024
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Hy3
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructHy3Leader
Aider polyglot16.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
SWE-bench Verified47.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1507Only Hy3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)29.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
SciCodeNot measured48.6%Only Hy3 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured838.6Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: coding12761466Hy3
LMArena Text: software and IT12611463Hy3
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1511Only Hy3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1487Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Hy3
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructHy3Leader
AA Intelligence Index6.7Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Epoch Capabilities Index119.5Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
Agentic workNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Hy3
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructHy3Leader
Neither model has a result on 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Hy3
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructHy3Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)41.7%89.7%Hy3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.5%33.5%Hy3
LMArena Text: hard prompts12511447Hy3
LMArena Text: expert12211461Hy3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12691455Hy3
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Hy3
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructHy3Leader
GSM8K93.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math12511473Hy3
LMArena Text: mathematical work12431482Hy3
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Hy3
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructHy3Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)63.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
MMLU79.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
AI2 Reasoning Challenge70.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science12211457Hy3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare11871452Hy3
LMArena Text: legal and government12571422Hy3
LMArena Text: business and finance12241424Hy3
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Hy3
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructHy3Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1230Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1205Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1208Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1163Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1233Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1227Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1199Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1157Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index011
General benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Hy3
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructHy3Leader
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured79.0%Only Hy3 measured
HellaSwag83.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
WinoGrande80.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text12301438Hy3
LMArena Text: instruction following12231426Hy3
LMArena Text: creative writing11741403Hy3
LMArena Text: English12481448Hy3
LMArena Text: non-English12051426Hy3
LMArena Text: Chinese12221485Hy3
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1449Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1397Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1396Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1456Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1457Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: Russian12281432Hy3
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1447Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12221436Hy3
LMArena Text: longer queries12511442Hy3
LMArena Text: writing and language11911414Hy3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media11501400Hy3
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Hy3
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructHy3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request
Hy3$0.0004Fits in one request

Hy3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.036Exceeds the context window
Hy3$0.0082Fits in one request

Hy3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.142Exceeds the context window
Hy3$0.032Fits in one request

Hy3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Hy3
SpecificationQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructTencent Hy3
MakerQwenTencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedNovember 11, 2024July 6, 2026
Context window33K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.66$0.132
Output $/Mtok$1.00$0.528
Coding index30.543.9
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct better than Hy3 for coding?

Pick Hy3 for coding: it scores 43.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 30.5 for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct, though on 1 benchmark against 2. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Hy3?

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs $0.66 per million input tokens and $1.00 per million output tokens; Hy3 costs $0.132 and $0.528. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Hy3?

Hy3, with 262K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Hy3 comparison based on?

24 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Hy3's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next