LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Updated October 21, 2026. 26 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen
Coding
30.5
Overall
6.7
Output $/M
$1.00
0
Qwen3.5 397B A17BQwen
Coding
28.6
Overall
21.4
Output $/M
$2.34
26
vs boards won of 26 shared

Decision reading

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3.5 397B A17B are level for coding, 30.5 against 28.6 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide.

Pick Qwen3.5 397B A17B when the context window is larger, 262K against 33K tokens, or when what matters is LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads. Pick Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct when output tokens cost 2.3x less.

Shared results
26
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct only
9
Qwen3.5 397B A17B only
39
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 30.5 from 2 benchmarks, Qwen3.5 397B A17B 28.6 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Knowledge, 37.5 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 41.7% against Qwen3.5 397B A17B 89.3%, 47.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct $1.00 against Qwen3.5 397B A17B $2.34 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
Context window
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct takes 33K tokens, Qwen3.5 397B A17B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructBarsQwen3.5 397B A17BTies
Coding02
Intelligence02
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General011
All shared boards026
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Aider polyglot16.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
SWE-bench Verified47.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1400Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)29.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
SciCodeNot measured44.8%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured40.9%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
ALE-BenchNot measured621.9Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: coding12761464Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: software and IT12611463Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1388Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1410Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.721.4Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Epoch Capabilities Index119.5146.8Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured95.6%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured24.9%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)41.7%89.3%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.5%29.0%Qwen3.5 397B A17B
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured86.4%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured18.0%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12511448Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: expert12211462Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12691450Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1277Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1292Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured88.9%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured31.2%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
GSM8K93.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math12511453Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: mathematical work12431454Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)63.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
MMLU79.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
AI2 Reasoning Challenge70.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science12211457Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare11871455Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: legal and government12571441Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: business and finance12241435Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1191Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1163Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1141Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1175Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1161Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1180Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1139Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index011
General benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
IFBenchNot measured78.8%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured77.3%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
DTBenchNot measured87.5%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMCANot measured37.9%Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
HellaSwag83.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
WinoGrande80.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct measured
LMArena Text12301437Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: instruction following12231424Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: creative writing11741402Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena VisionNot measured1262Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: English12481443Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: non-English12051430Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: Chinese12221498Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1445Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1429Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1384Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1462Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1441Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: Russian12281430Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1447Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12221446Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: longer queries12511441Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: writing and language11911415Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media11501399Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1268Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1314Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1271Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1262Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1230Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1265Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1260Only Qwen3.5 397B A17B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3.5 397B A17BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.0016Fits in one request

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.036Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.027Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct$0.142Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.101Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
SpecificationQwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructQwen3.5 397B A17B
MakerQwenQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedNovember 11, 2024February 16, 2026
Context window33K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.66$0.39
Output $/Mtok$1.00$2.34
Coding index30.528.6
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct better than Qwen3.5 397B A17B for coding?

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3.5 397B A17B are level for coding, 30.5 against 28.6 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide. Pick Qwen3.5 397B A17B when the context window is larger, 262K against 33K tokens, or when what matters is LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads. Pick Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct when output tokens cost 2.3x less.

Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs $0.66 per million input tokens and $1.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.39 and $2.34. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Qwen3.5 397B A17B, with 262K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B comparison based on?

26 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5 397B A17B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next