Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs 1.8x less per output token than Mistral Medium 3.1 ($1.10 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 25 benchmarks have a result for both.

Mistral Medium 3.1Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
7
R Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflection
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
18
vs boards won of 25 shared

Mistral Medium 3.1 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mistral Medium 3.1 for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
25
Mistral Medium 3.1 only
49
Beam 1.0 501B A23B only
3
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mistral Medium 3.1 not benchmarked, Beam 1.0 501B A23B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 16.8 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: game dev: Mistral Medium 3.1 1073 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1224, 18.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mistral Medium 3.1 $2.00 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B $1.10 per million output tokens, 1.8x apart.
Context window
Mistral Medium 3.1 takes 131K tokens, Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMistral Medium 3.1BarsBeam 1.0 501B A23BTies
Coding02
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge31
Web design02
General48
All shared boards718
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1437Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
AA Coding Index20.5Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)44.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)40.6%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
SciCode32.4%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)10.6%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
ALE-Bench210.2Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: coding14331473Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: software and IT14361461Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1443Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1436Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AA Intelligence Index9.2Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AA Agentic Index1.9Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom40.6%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)63.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)58.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.7%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14261442Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: expert14081447Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14351451Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Vision: diagrams1175Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1165Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AIME42.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)87.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
AA Math Index38.3Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)38.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: math14081459Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: mathematical work14121475Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
Knowledge benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
MMLU Pro75.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)62.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)50.7%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)70.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)36.5%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)78.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)68.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: science14441430Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14491376Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: legal and government14391433Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: business and finance14181430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Web design benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Design Arena: websites11321250Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Design Arena: UI components1097Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: game dev10731224Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Design Arena: data viz1144Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: 3D1081Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1120Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: SVG992Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art997Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index48
General benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
IFBench39.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)42.7%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
DTBench67.5%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMCA19.1%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text14241425Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: instruction following13981430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: creative writing13911390Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Vision1172Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: English14381436Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: non-English14081413Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: Chinese14471424Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: German1432Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1379Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1380Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: French14601461Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: Spanish1433Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: Russian14111412Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: Polish1430Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14181414Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: longer queries14061429Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: writing and language13951400Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13901399Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Vision: English1179Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1190Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1175Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1168Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1145Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1147Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1200Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Beam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.1$0.0014Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.0009Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.1$0.026Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.021Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.1$0.100Exceeds the context window
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.081Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mistral Medium 3.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
SpecificationMistral Medium 3.1Reflection Beam 1.0 501B A23B
MakerMistral AIReflection
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 13, 2025October 16, 2026
Context window131K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.40$0.35
Output $/Mtok$2.00$1.10
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Beam 1.0 501B A23B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mistral Medium 3.1 for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs $0.35 and $1.10. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Beam 1.0 501B A23B, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B comparison based on?

25 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Mistral Medium 3.1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Beam 1.0 501B A23B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next