Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 leads Mistral Medium 3.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.7 to 9.2, and Mistral Medium 3.1 costs 1.8x less per output token ($2.00 vs $3.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 38 benchmarks have a result for both.

Mistral Medium 3.1Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
28
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
52.9
Output $/M
$3.50
10
vs boards won of 38 shared

Mistral Medium 3.1 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mistral Medium 3.1 for output tokens 1.8x cheaper ($2.00 vs $3.50 per million) and a larger context window (131K against 128K tokens).

Shared results
38
Mistral Medium 3.1 only
36
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 only
8
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mistral Medium 3.1 not benchmarked, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 15.0 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: data viz: Mistral Medium 3.1 1144 against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 950, 24.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mistral Medium 3.1 $2.00 against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 $3.50 per million output tokens, 1.8x apart.
Context window
Mistral Medium 3.1 takes 131K tokens, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMistral Medium 3.1BarsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Ties
Coding21
Intelligence01
Agentic work10
Reasoning21
Math02
Knowledge31
Web design60
General144
All shared boards2810
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index21
Coding benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Coding Index20.522.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)44.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)40.6%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
SciCode32.4%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)10.6%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
WeirdMLNot measured41.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
ALE-Bench210.2Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: coding14331424Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: software and IT14361431Mistral Medium 3.1
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Intelligence Index9.212.7Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Agentic Index1.91.3Mistral Medium 3.1
τ²-Bench Telecom40.6%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured-$11Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
Reasoning benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)63.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)58.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.7%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured80.1%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured9.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14261416Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: expert14081463Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14351432Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Vision: diagrams1175Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1165Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AIME42.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)87.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
AA Math Index38.3Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)38.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: math14081412Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: mathematical work14121435Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
Knowledge benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
MMLU Pro75.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)62.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)50.7%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)70.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)36.5%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)78.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)68.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured40.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: science14441433Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14491456Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: legal and government14391415Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: business and finance14181413Mistral Medium 3.1
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Design Arena: websites11321052Mistral Medium 3.1
Design Arena: UI components1097942Mistral Medium 3.1
Design Arena: game dev1073956Mistral Medium 3.1
Design Arena: data viz1144950Mistral Medium 3.1
Design Arena: 3D1081997Mistral Medium 3.1
Design Arena: all code categories11201032Mistral Medium 3.1
Design Arena: SVG992Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art997Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index144
General benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
IFBench39.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)42.7%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
DTBench67.5%80.3%Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMCA19.1%29.3%Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured75.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured82.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text14241415Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: instruction following13981386Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: creative writing13911384Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Vision1172Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: English14381429Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: non-English14081397Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Chinese14471481Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: German14321408Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Japanese13791386Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: Korean13801375Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: French1460Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish14331389Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Russian14111401Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: Polish14301390Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: multi-turn14181406Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: longer queries14061400Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: writing and language13951388Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13901370Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Vision: English1179Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1190Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1175Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1168Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1145Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1147Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1200Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.1$0.0014Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.0022Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.1$0.026Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.033Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.1$0.100Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.125Exceeds the context window

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
SpecificationMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
MakerMistral AIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 13, 2025July 25, 2025
Context window131K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.40$0.45
Output $/Mtok$2.00$3.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mistral Medium 3.1 for output tokens 1.8x cheaper ($2.00 vs $3.50 per million) and a larger context window (131K against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.45 and $3.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Mistral Medium 3.1, with 131K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 comparison based on?

38 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Mistral Medium 3.1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next