Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 leads Mistral Medium 3.1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.0 to 9.2, and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs 2.6x less per output token ($0.775 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 20 benchmarks have a result for both.

Mistral Medium 3.1Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
6
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.775
14
vs boards won of 20 shared

Mistral Medium 3.1 or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mistral Medium 3.1 for work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or SciCode, where it leads.

Shared results
20
Mistral Medium 3.1 only
54
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 only
4
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mistral Medium 3.1 not benchmarked, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 52.7 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Math Index: Mistral Medium 3.1 38.3 against Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 91.0, 52.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mistral Medium 3.1 $2.00 against Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 $0.775 per million output tokens, 2.6x apart.
Context window
Mistral Medium 3.1 takes 131K tokens, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMistral Medium 3.1BarsQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Ties
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning02
Math02
Knowledge01
Web design60
General04
All shared boards614
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Coding Index20.5Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)44.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)40.6%78.8%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
SciCode32.4%41.4%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)10.6%15.2%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
WeirdMLNot measured38.7%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
ALE-Bench210.2Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: coding1433Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1436Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Intelligence Index9.212.0Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
AA Agentic Index1.9Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom40.6%53.2%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)Not measured52.1%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)63.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)58.8%79.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.7%15.9%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
ARC-AGINot measured11.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured1.3%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1426Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: expert1408Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1435Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1175Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1165Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
AIME42.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)87.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.9%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
AA Math Index38.391.0Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)38.3%91.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: math1408Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1412Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
MMLU Pro75.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)62.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)50.7%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)70.3%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)36.5%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)78.2%Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)68.3%84.3%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: science1444Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1449Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1439Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1418Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
Design Arena: websites11321058Mistral Medium 3.1
Design Arena: UI components1097963Mistral Medium 3.1
Design Arena: game dev1073951Mistral Medium 3.1
Design Arena: data viz11441070Mistral Medium 3.1
Design Arena: 3D1081994Mistral Medium 3.1
Design Arena: all code categories11201038Mistral Medium 3.1
Design Arena: SVG992Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art997Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
General benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
IFBench39.8%51.2%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)42.7%72.0%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
DTBench67.5%78.4%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
LMCA19.1%23.5%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text1424Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1398Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1391Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision1172Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: English1438Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1408Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1447Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: German1432Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1379Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1380Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: French1460Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1433Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1411Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1430Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1418Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1406Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1395Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1390Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: English1179Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1190Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1175Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1168Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1145Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1147Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1200Not measuredOnly Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.1$0.0014Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.0005Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.1$0.026Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.0096Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mistral Medium 3.1$0.100Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.037Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
SpecificationMistral Medium 3.1Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
MakerMistral AIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 13, 2025July 21, 2025
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.40$0.145
Output $/Mtok$2.00$0.775
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mistral Medium 3.1 for work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or SciCode, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs $0.145 and $0.775. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 comparison based on?

20 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Mistral Medium 3.1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next