Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Sonar
Updated October 21, 2026. 5 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Mistral Medium 3.1 has the edge where the context window is larger, 131K against 127K tokens, and where what matters is Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) or MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 5
- Mistral Medium 3.1 only
- 69
- Sonar only
- 0
- Like-for-like categories
- 4 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Mistral Medium 3.1
Mistral Medium 3.1 leads, 9.2 against 7.7.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Mistral Medium 3.1 has a AA Agentic Index result, 1.9.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only Mistral Medium 3.1 has a AIME result, 42.3%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only Mistral Medium 3.1 has a MMLU Pro result, 75.3%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Mistral Medium 3.1 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1133.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Mistral Medium 3.1
Mistral Medium 3.1 takes 131K tokens against 127K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Mistral Medium 3.1
Mistral Medium 3.1 $0.0014, Sonar $0.0015 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Mistral Medium 3.1 not benchmarked, Sonar not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Coding, 11.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): Mistral Medium 3.1 58.8% against Sonar 47.1%, 11.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Mistral Medium 3.1 $2.00 against Sonar $1.00 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
- Context window
- Mistral Medium 3.1 takes 131K tokens, Sonar 127K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Bars | Sonar | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 1 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 1 | 1 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 3 | 2 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Sonar | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Coding Index | 20.5 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 44.8% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 40.6% | 29.5% | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
| SciCode | 32.4% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 10.6% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 210.2 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1433 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1436 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Sonar | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 9.2 | 7.7 | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Sonar | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 1.9 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 40.6% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Sonar | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 63.0% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 58.8% | 47.1% | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 4.7% | 4.9% | Sonar |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1426 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1408 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1435 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1175 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1165 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Sonar | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 42.3% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | 87.0% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 90.9% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| AA Math Index | 38.3 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 38.3% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1408 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1412 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Sonar | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 75.3% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 62.0% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 50.7% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 70.3% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 36.5% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 78.2% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 68.3% | 68.9% | Sonar |
| LMArena Text: science | 1444 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1449 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1439 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1418 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Sonar | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1133 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1099 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1074 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1144 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1081 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1120 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 993 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 997 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index29 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Sonar | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 39.8% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 42.7% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| DTBench | 67.5% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMCA | 19.1% | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1424 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1398 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1391 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision | 1172 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1438 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1408 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1447 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: German | 1432 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1379 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1380 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1460 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1433 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1411 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1430 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1418 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1406 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1395 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1390 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1179 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1190 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1175 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1168 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: captioning | 1145 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | 1147 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1200 | Not measured | Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Sonar | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Perplexity Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Mistral AI | Perplexity |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | August 13, 2025 | January 27, 2025 |
| Context window | 131K | 127K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.40 | $1.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $2.00 | $1.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Sonar for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Mistral Medium 3.1 has the edge where the context window is larger, 131K against 127K tokens, and where what matters is Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) or MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Sonar?
Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Sonar costs $1.00 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Sonar?
Mistral Medium 3.1, with 131K tokens against 127K.
How many benchmarks is the Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Sonar comparison based on?
5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Mistral Medium 3.1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Sonar's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.