Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mistral Large 2407 vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Mistral Medium 3.1 leads Mistral Large 2407 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 9.2 to 7.6, and Mistral Medium 3.1 costs 3.0x less per output token ($2.00 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 11 benchmarks have a result for both.

Mistral Large 2407Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$6.00
0
Mistral Medium 3.1Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
10
vs boards won of 11 shared, 1 tied

Mistral Large 2407 or Mistral Medium 3.1: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mistral Large 2407 for work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
11
Mistral Large 2407 only
6
Mistral Medium 3.1 only
63
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mistral Large 2407 not benchmarked, Mistral Medium 3.1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 38.3 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Mistral Large 2407 2.0% against Mistral Medium 3.1 42.7%, 40.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mistral Large 2407 $6.00 against Mistral Medium 3.1 $2.00 per million output tokens, 3.0x apart.
Context window
Both take 131K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMistral Large 2407BarsMistral Medium 3.1Ties
Coding01
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning02
Math02
Knowledge001 tie
General03
All shared boards0101 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Mistral Large 2407 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkMistral Large 2407Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
AA Coding IndexNot measured20.5Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured44.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)26.7%40.6%Mistral Medium 3.1
SciCodeNot measured32.4%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured10.6%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured210.2Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1433Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1436Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Mistral Large 2407 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkMistral Large 2407Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index7.69.2Mistral Medium 3.1
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Mistral Large 2407 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkMistral Large 2407Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.9Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom33.0%40.6%Mistral Medium 3.1
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Mistral Large 2407 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkMistral Large 2407Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured63.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)47.2%58.8%Mistral Medium 3.1
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)2.9%4.7%Mistral Medium 3.1
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)49.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large 2407 measured
SimpleBench22.5%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large 2407 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1426Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1408Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1435Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1175Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1165Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Mistral Large 2407 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkMistral Large 2407Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
AIMENot measured42.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured87.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured90.9%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
AA Math Index0.038.3Mistral Medium 3.1
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)0.0%38.3%Mistral Medium 3.1
OTIS Mock AIME8.5%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large 2407 measured
MATH level 544.8%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large 2407 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1408Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1412Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index00
Knowledge benchmarks for Mistral Large 2407 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkMistral Large 2407Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
MMLU ProNot measured75.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured62.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured50.7%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured70.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured36.5%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured78.2%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)68.3%68.3%Tie
MMLU80.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large 2407 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1444Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1449Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1439Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1418Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Mistral Large 2407 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkMistral Large 2407Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1133Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1100Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1074Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1144Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1081Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1120Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured993Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured997Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
General benchmarks for Mistral Large 2407 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkMistral Large 2407Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
IFBench31.6%39.8%Mistral Medium 3.1
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)2.0%42.7%Mistral Medium 3.1
DTBench61.2%67.5%Mistral Medium 3.1
LMCANot measured19.1%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)69.0%Not measuredOnly Mistral Large 2407 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1424Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1398Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1391Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1172Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1438Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1408Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1447Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1432Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1379Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1380Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1460Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1433Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1411Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1430Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1418Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1406Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1395Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1390Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1179Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1190Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1175Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1168Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1145Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1147Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1200Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mistral Large 2407 and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkMistral Large 2407Mistral Medium 3.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mistral Large 2407$0.0050Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.1$0.0014Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mistral Large 2407$0.118Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.1$0.026Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mistral Large 2407$0.460Exceeds the context window
Mistral Medium 3.1$0.100Exceeds the context window

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mistral Large 2407 and Mistral Medium 3.1
SpecificationMistral Large 2407Mistral Medium 3.1
MakerMistral AIMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedNovember 19, 2024August 13, 2025
Context window131K131K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.40
Output $/Mtok$6.00$2.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mistral Large 2407 better than Mistral Medium 3.1 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mistral Large 2407 for work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Large 2407 or Mistral Medium 3.1?

Mistral Large 2407 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.40 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Large 2407 or Mistral Medium 3.1?

Neither: both take 131K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Mistral Large 2407 vs Mistral Medium 3.1 comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Mistral Large 2407's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Medium 3.1's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next