Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mercury 2 vs Mistral Large 3 2512

Mercury 2 leads Mistral Large 3 2512 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 10.8 to 9.3, and Mercury 2 costs 2.0x less per output token ($0.75 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 12 benchmarks have a result for both.

Mercury 2Inception
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.75
5
Mistral Large 3 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
7
vs boards won of 12 shared

Mercury 2 or Mistral Large 3 2512: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mercury 2 for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($0.75 vs $1.50 per million) and work measured by Design Arena: websites or Design Arena: UI components, where it leads.

Shared results
12
Mercury 2 only
30
Mistral Large 3 2512 only
16
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mercury 2 not benchmarked, Mistral Large 3 2512 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 14.2 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ALE-Bench: Mercury 2 785.6 against Mistral Large 3 2512 264.7, 17.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mercury 2 $0.75 against Mistral Large 3 2512 $1.50 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
Mercury 2 takes 128K tokens, Mistral Large 3 2512 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMercury 2BarsMistral Large 3 2512Ties
Coding20
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Web design17
All shared boards57
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkMercury 2Mistral Large 3 2512Leader
LMArena WebDev1171Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
AA Coding Index31.120.1Mercury 2
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured55.3%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured41.4%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
SciCode37.7%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)26.5%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
WeirdML43.2%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
ALE-Bench785.6264.7Mercury 2
LMArena Text: coding1390Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1385Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1160Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1199Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkMercury 2Mistral Large 3 2512Leader
AA Intelligence Index10.89.3Mercury 2
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkMercury 2Mistral Large 3 2512Leader
AA Agentic Index1.61.0Mercury 2
τ²-Bench Telecom70.8%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkMercury 2Mistral Large 3 2512Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured68.4%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured66.2%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)77.0%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.1%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1362Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: expert1358Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1374Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkMercury 2Mistral Large 3 2512Leader
AIMENot measured42.9%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured85.4%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkMercury 2Mistral Large 3 2512Leader
MMLU ProNot measured79.8%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured79.1%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured61.4%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured61.0%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured73.1%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured52.1%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
LMArena Text: science1343Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1363Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1349Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17
Web design benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkMercury 2Mistral Large 3 2512Leader
Design Arena: websites10361162Mistral Large 3 2512
Design Arena: UI components9981102Mistral Large 3 2512
Design Arena: game dev9851080Mistral Large 3 2512
Design Arena: data viz10091136Mistral Large 3 2512
Design Arena: 3D9831100Mistral Large 3 2512
Design Arena: all code categories10221142Mistral Large 3 2512
Design Arena: SVG998993Mercury 2
Design Arena: ASCII art9881069Mistral Large 3 2512
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkMercury 2Mistral Large 3 2512Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured24.6%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
IFBench69.8%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)43.7%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
DTBenchNot measured65.1%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
LMCANot measured16.7%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
LMArena Text1354Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1328Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1286Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: English1378Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1330Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1414Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1304Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1357Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1329Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1300Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1314Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkMercury 2Mistral Large 3 2512Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mercury 2$0.0006Fits in one request
Mistral Large 3 2512$0.0013Fits in one request

Mercury 2 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mercury 2$0.015Fits in one request
Mistral Large 3 2512$0.029Fits in one request

Mercury 2 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mercury 2$0.058Exceeds the context window
Mistral Large 3 2512$0.115Fits in one request

Mercury 2 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mercury 2 and Mistral Large 3 2512
SpecificationInception Mercury 2Mistral Large 3 2512
MakerInceptionMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 4, 2026December 1, 2025
Context window128K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.25$0.50
Output $/Mtok$0.75$1.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.77
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mercury 2 better than Mistral Large 3 2512 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mercury 2 for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($0.75 vs $1.50 per million) and work measured by Design Arena: websites or Design Arena: UI components, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Mercury 2 or Mistral Large 3 2512?

Mercury 2 costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.75 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 3 2512 costs $0.50 and $1.50. Cost per solved task is known for Mistral Large 3 2512 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Mercury 2 or Mistral Large 3 2512?

Mistral Large 3 2512, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Mercury 2 vs Mistral Large 3 2512 comparison based on?

12 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Mercury 2's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Mistral Large 3 2512's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next