GPT-5 Pro vs UnslopNemo 12B
UnslopNemo 12B costs 300.0x less per output token than GPT-5 Pro ($0.40 vs $120.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $120.00
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $0.40
GPT-5 Pro or UnslopNemo 12B: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Compare them on price, context and the boards below.
No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5 Pro has results on WeirdML, Epoch Capabilities Index and ARC-AGI; UnslopNemo 12B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Long documents
Listed context window
UnslopNemo 12B
UnslopNemo 12B takes 1.02M tokens against 400K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
UnslopNemo 12B
GPT-5 Pro $0.075, UnslopNemo 12B $0.0006 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- GPT-5 Pro not benchmarked, UnslopNemo 12B not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- GPT-5 Pro $120.00 against UnslopNemo 12B $0.40 per million output tokens, 300.0x apart.
- Context window
- GPT-5 Pro takes 400K tokens, UnslopNemo 12B 1.02M.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index1 board measured
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | UnslopNemo 12B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 60.4% | Not measured | Only GPT-5 Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 42 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | UnslopNemo 12B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.6 | Not measured | Only GPT-5 Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | UnslopNemo 12B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI | 70.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-5 Pro measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 18.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-5 Pro measured |
| SimpleBench | 61.6% | Not measured | Only GPT-5 Pro measured |
| Chess puzzles | 48.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5 Pro measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 76.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-5 Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | UnslopNemo 12B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 55.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-5 Pro measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 19.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-5 Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | UnslopNemo 12B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRBench Finance | 51.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-5 Pro measured |
| PRBench Legal | 49.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-5 Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
UnslopNemo 12B costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
UnslopNemo 12B costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
UnslopNemo 12B costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | OpenAI GPT-5 Pro | TheDrummer UnslopNemo 12B |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | TheDrummer |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | October 6, 2025 | November 8, 2024 |
| Context window | 400K | 1.02M |
| Input $/Mtok | $15.00 | $0.40 |
| Output $/Mtok | $120.00 | $0.40 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GPT-5 Pro better than UnslopNemo 12B for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Pro or UnslopNemo 12B?
GPT-5 Pro costs $15.00 per million input tokens and $120.00 per million output tokens; UnslopNemo 12B costs $0.40 and $0.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5 Pro or UnslopNemo 12B?
UnslopNemo 12B, with 1.02M tokens against 400K.
Has any benchmark tested both GPT-5 Pro and UnslopNemo 12B?
No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5 Pro has results on WeirdML, Epoch Capabilities Index and ARC-AGI; UnslopNemo 12B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.