Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5 Image Mini vs Mistral Medium 3.1

GPT-5 Image Mini and Mistral Medium 3.1 cost about the same per output token ($2.00 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GPT-5 Image MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
Mistral Medium 3.1Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
9.2
Output $/M
$2.00
vs $2.00 vs $2.00 per 1M output tokens. About the same price.

GPT-5 Image Mini or Mistral Medium 3.1: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-5 Image Mini for a larger context window (400K against 131K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5 Image Mini has results on Design Arena: images, Design Arena: graphic design and Design Arena: logos; Mistral Medium 3.1 on AA Coding Index, LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) and LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5 Image Mini not benchmarked, Mistral Medium 3.1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Both cost $2.00 per million output tokens.
Context window
GPT-5 Image Mini takes 400K tokens, Mistral Medium 3.1 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index8 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5 Image Mini and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkGPT-5 Image MiniMistral Medium 3.1Leader
AA Coding IndexNot measured20.5Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured44.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured40.6%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
SciCodeNot measured32.4%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured10.6%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured210.2Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1433Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1436Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5 Image Mini and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkGPT-5 Image MiniMistral Medium 3.1Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured9.2Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5 Image Mini and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkGPT-5 Image MiniMistral Medium 3.1Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.9Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured40.6%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5 Image Mini and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkGPT-5 Image MiniMistral Medium 3.1Leader
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured63.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured58.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured4.7%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1426Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1408Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1435Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1175Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1165Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Math benchmarks for GPT-5 Image Mini and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkGPT-5 Image MiniMistral Medium 3.1Leader
AIMENot measured42.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)Not measured87.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured90.9%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured38.3Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured38.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1408Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1412Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5 Image Mini and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkGPT-5 Image MiniMistral Medium 3.1Leader
MMLU ProNot measured75.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured62.0%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured50.7%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured70.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured36.5%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured78.2%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured68.3%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1444Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1449Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1439Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1418Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5 Image Mini and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkGPT-5 Image MiniMistral Medium 3.1Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1133Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1100Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1074Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1144Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1081Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1120Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured993Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured997Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index29 boards measured
General benchmarks for GPT-5 Image Mini and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkGPT-5 Image MiniMistral Medium 3.1Leader
IFBenchNot measured39.8%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured42.7%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
DTBenchNot measured67.5%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMCANot measured19.1%Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1424Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1398Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1391Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1172Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1438Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1408Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1447Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1432Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1379Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1380Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1460Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1433Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1411Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1430Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1418Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1406Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1395Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1390Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1179Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1190Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1175Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1168Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1145Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1147Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1200Only Mistral Medium 3.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5 Image Mini and Mistral Medium 3.1
BenchmarkGPT-5 Image MiniMistral Medium 3.1Leader
Design Arena: images1184Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Image Mini measured
Design Arena: graphic design1165Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Image Mini measured
Design Arena: logos1209Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Image Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5 Image Mini$0.0035Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.1$0.0014Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5 Image Mini$0.131Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.1$0.026Fits in one request

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5 Image Mini$0.520Fits in one request
Mistral Medium 3.1$0.100Exceeds the context window

Mistral Medium 3.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5 Image Mini and Mistral Medium 3.1
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5 Image MiniMistral Medium 3.1
MakerOpenAIMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 16, 2025August 13, 2025
Context window400K131K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.40
Output $/Mtok$2.00$2.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5 Image Mini better than Mistral Medium 3.1 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-5 Image Mini for a larger context window (400K against 131K tokens).

Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Image Mini or Mistral Medium 3.1?

GPT-5 Image Mini costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.40 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5 Image Mini or Mistral Medium 3.1?

GPT-5 Image Mini, with 400K tokens against 131K.

Has any benchmark tested both GPT-5 Image Mini and Mistral Medium 3.1?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5 Image Mini has results on Design Arena: images, Design Arena: graphic design and Design Arena: logos; Mistral Medium 3.1 on AA Coding Index, LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) and LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next