Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.5 Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs 900.0x less per output token than GPT-5.5 Pro ($0.20 vs $180.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Replace GPT-5.5 Pro Replace Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
GPT-5.5 ProOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$180.00
Nemotron 3.5 Content SafetyNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
vs $180.00 vs $0.20 per 1M output tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 900.0x cheaper.

GPT-5.5 Pro or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-5.5 Pro for a larger context window (1.05M against 131K tokens).

Model AGPT-5.5 ProOpenAINot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BNemotron 3.5 Content SafetyNVIDIANot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5.5 Pro has results on Epoch Capabilities Index, ARC-AGI and ARC-AGI-2; Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.5 Pro not benchmarked, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GPT-5.5 Pro $180.00 against Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety $0.20 per million output tokens, 900.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.5 Pro takes 1.05M tokens, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.5 Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProNemotron 3.5 Content SafetyLeader
Epoch Capabilities Index162.9Not measuredOnly GPT-5.5 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.5 Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProNemotron 3.5 Content SafetyLeader
ARC-AGI96.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.5 Pro measured
ARC-AGI-284.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.5 Pro measured
SimpleBench76.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.5 Pro measured
Chess puzzles62.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.5 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.5 Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProNemotron 3.5 Content SafetyLeader
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 387.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.5 Pro measured
FrontierMath, tier 478.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.5 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
General benchmarks for GPT-5.5 Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProNemotron 3.5 Content SafetyLeader
DTBench96.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.5 Pro measured
LMCA53.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.5 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 46 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.5 Pro$0.120Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety$0.0003Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.5 Pro$2.04Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety$0.011Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.5 Pro$7.80Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety$0.042Exceeds the context window

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.5 Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.5 ProNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
MakerOpenAINVIDIA
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 24, 2026June 4, 2026
Context window1.05M131K
Input $/Mtok$30.00$0.20
Output $/Mtok$180.00$0.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.5 Pro better than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-5.5 Pro for a larger context window (1.05M against 131K tokens).

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.5 Pro or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

GPT-5.5 Pro costs $30.00 per million input tokens and $180.00 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs $0.20 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.5 Pro or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

GPT-5.5 Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

Has any benchmark tested both GPT-5.5 Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5.5 Pro has results on Epoch Capabilities Index, ARC-AGI and ARC-AGI-2; Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next