Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.4 Pro vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct

Updated October 21, 2026. No benchmark has tested both models yet. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-5.4 ProOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$180.00
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
9.6
Output $/M
$0.44
vs $180.00 vs $0.44 per 1M output tokens. Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct is 409.1x cheaper.

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

GPT-5.4 Pro has the edge where the context window is larger, 1.05M against 262K tokens.

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5.4 Pro has results on WeirdML, Epoch Capabilities Index and GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run); Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct on SWE-bench Verified, SWE-bench Lite and LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.4 Pro not benchmarked, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GPT-5.4 Pro $180.00 against Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct $0.44 per million output tokens, 409.1x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.4 Pro takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured60.4%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
SWE-bench LiteNot measured49.7%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured40.3%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured15.2%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
WeirdML57.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured9.6Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Epoch Capabilities Index159.6Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Pro measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured34.5%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured51.6%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.8%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)94.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Pro measured
ARC-AGI94.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Pro measured
ARC-AGI-283.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Pro measured
SimpleBench74.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Pro measured
Chess puzzles59.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured29.0Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured29.0%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 382.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Pro measured
FrontierMath, tier 458.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured70.6%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
SimpleQA Verified46.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1087Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1046Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1085Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
General benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructLeader
IFBenchNot measured32.7%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured32.7%Only Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 44 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.4 Pro$0.120Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.0003Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.4 Pro$2.04Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.0068Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.4 Pro$7.80Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.026Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.4 ProQwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 5, 2026July 31, 2025
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$30.00$0.11
Output $/Mtok$180.00$0.44
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.4 Pro better than Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. GPT-5.4 Pro has the edge where the context window is larger, 1.05M against 262K tokens.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct?

GPT-5.4 Pro costs $30.00 per million input tokens and $180.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs $0.11 and $0.44. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct?

GPT-5.4 Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

Has any benchmark tested both GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5.4 Pro has results on WeirdML, Epoch Capabilities Index and GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run); Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct on SWE-bench Verified, SWE-bench Lite and LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next