GPT-5.2 Pro vs Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct costs 28.0x less per output token than GPT-5.2 Pro ($6.00 vs $168.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.
GPT-5.2 Pro or Mixtral 8x22B Instruct: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick GPT-5.2 Pro for a larger context window (400K against 66K tokens).
- Shared results
- 1
- GPT-5.2 Pro only
- 6
- Mixtral 8x22B Instruct only
- 7
- Like-for-like categories
- 1 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only Mixtral 8x22B Instruct has a AA Intelligence Index result, 5.7.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro takes 400K tokens against 66K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
GPT-5.2 Pro $0.105, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct $0.0050 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- GPT-5.2 Pro not benchmarked, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Intelligence, 42.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- Epoch Capabilities Index: GPT-5.2 Pro 156.3 against Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 122.0, 42.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GPT-5.2 Pro $168.00 against Mixtral 8x22B Instruct $6.00 per million output tokens, 28.0x apart.
- Context window
- GPT-5.2 Pro takes 400K tokens, Mixtral 8x22B Instruct 66K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GPT-5.2 Pro | Bars | Mixtral 8x22B Instruct | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 1 | 0 |
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Mixtral 8x22B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 14.8% | Only Mixtral 8x22B Instruct measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 0.0% | Only Mixtral 8x22B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Mixtral 8x22B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | Not measured | 5.7 | Only Mixtral 8x22B Instruct measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.3 | 122.0 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
Agentic workNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Mixtral 8x22B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 41 boards here | |||
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Mixtral 8x22B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 33.2% | Only Mixtral 8x22B Instruct measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 4.0% | Only Mixtral 8x22B Instruct measured |
| ARC-AGI | 90.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.2 Pro measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.2 Pro measured |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.2 Pro measured |
| Chess puzzles | 60.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.2 Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Mixtral 8x22B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 74.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.2 Pro measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 46.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.2 Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Mixtral 8x22B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 53.7% | Only Mixtral 8x22B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Mixtral 8x22B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 9 boards here | |||
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Mixtral 8x22B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| DTBench | Not measured | 55.1% | Only Mixtral 8x22B Instruct measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 45 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Mixtral 8x22B Instruct | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | OpenAI GPT-5.2 Pro | Mistral Mixtral 8x22B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | Mistral AI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | December 10, 2025 | April 17, 2024 |
| Context window | 400K | 66K |
| Input $/Mtok | $21.00 | $2.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $168.00 | $6.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Mixtral 8x22B Instruct for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-5.2 Pro for a larger context window (400K against 66K tokens).
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Pro or Mixtral 8x22B Instruct?
GPT-5.2 Pro costs $21.00 per million input tokens and $168.00 per million output tokens; Mixtral 8x22B Instruct costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.2 Pro or Mixtral 8x22B Instruct?
GPT-5.2 Pro, with 400K tokens against 66K.
How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.2 Pro vs Mixtral 8x22B Instruct comparison based on?
1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-5.2 Pro's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mixtral 8x22B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.