Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.2-Codex vs Mistral Large 3 2512

GPT-5.2-Codex leads Mistral Large 3 2512 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 28.5 to 9.3, and Mistral Large 3 2512 costs 9.3x less per output token ($1.50 vs $14.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-5.2-CodexOpenAI
Coding
45.4
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$14.00
4
Mistral Large 3 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
0
vs boards won of 4 shared

GPT-5.2-Codex or Mistral Large 3 2512: which to pick

Only GPT-5.2-Codex has a coding score, 45.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Large 3 2512 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Mistral Large 3 2512 for output tokens 9.3x cheaper ($1.50 vs $14.00 per million).

Shared results
4
GPT-5.2-Codex only
18
Mistral Large 3 2512 only
24
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.2-Codex 45.4 from 3 benchmarks, Mistral Large 3 2512 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 32.7 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ALE-Bench: GPT-5.2-Codex 1299.9 against Mistral Large 3 2512 264.7, 34.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.2-Codex $14.00 against Mistral Large 3 2512 $1.50 per million output tokens, 9.3x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.2-Codex takes 400K tokens, Mistral Large 3 2512 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.2-CodexBarsMistral Large 3 2512Ties
Coding30
Intelligence10
All shared boards40
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index30
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.2-Codex and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGPT-5.2-CodexMistral Large 3 2512Leader
SWE-bench Verified72.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.2-Codex measured
SWE-bench Multilingual66.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.2-Codex measured
LMArena WebDev1339Not measuredOnly GPT-5.2-Codex measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured20.1Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)88.0%55.3%GPT-5.2-Codex
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)72.4%41.4%GPT-5.2-Codex
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)37.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.2-Codex measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)37.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.2-Codex measured
Terminal-Bench66.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.2-Codex measured
ALE-Bench1299.9264.7GPT-5.2-Codex
LMArena WebDev: React1329Not measuredOnly GPT-5.2-Codex measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1348Not measuredOnly GPT-5.2-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.2-Codex and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGPT-5.2-CodexMistral Large 3 2512Leader
AA Intelligence Index28.59.3GPT-5.2-Codex
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.2-Codex and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGPT-5.2-CodexMistral Large 3 2512Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.0Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1051Not measuredOnly GPT-5.2-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps993Not measuredOnly GPT-5.2-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1090Not measuredOnly GPT-5.2-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1176Not measuredOnly GPT-5.2-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1142Not measuredOnly GPT-5.2-Codex measured
τ²-Bench Telecom92.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.2-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.2-Codex and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGPT-5.2-CodexMistral Large 3 2512Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured68.4%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured66.2%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)89.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.2-Codex measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)35.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.2-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.2-Codex and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGPT-5.2-CodexMistral Large 3 2512Leader
AIMENot measured42.9%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
MGSM (Vals AI)Not measured85.4%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.2-Codex and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGPT-5.2-CodexMistral Large 3 2512Leader
MMLU ProNot measured79.8%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured79.1%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured61.4%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured61.0%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured73.1%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured52.1%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.2-Codex and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGPT-5.2-CodexMistral Large 3 2512Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1162Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1102Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1080Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1136Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1100Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1142Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured993Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1069Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-5.2-Codex and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGPT-5.2-CodexMistral Large 3 2512Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured24.6%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
IFBench77.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.2-Codex measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.2-Codex measured
DTBenchNot measured65.1%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
LMCANot measured16.7%Only Mistral Large 3 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.2-Codex and Mistral Large 3 2512
BenchmarkGPT-5.2-CodexMistral Large 3 2512Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.2-Codex$0.0088Fits in one request
Mistral Large 3 2512$0.0013Fits in one request

Mistral Large 3 2512 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.2-Codex$0.130Fits in one request
Mistral Large 3 2512$0.029Fits in one request

Mistral Large 3 2512 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.2-Codex$0.490Fits in one request
Mistral Large 3 2512$0.115Fits in one request

Mistral Large 3 2512 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.2-Codex and Mistral Large 3 2512
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.2-CodexMistral Large 3 2512
MakerOpenAIMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJanuary 14, 2026December 1, 2025
Context window400K262K
Input $/Mtok$1.75$0.50
Output $/Mtok$14.00$1.50
Coding index45.4Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it31
Cost per solved task$0.43$0.77
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.2-Codex better than Mistral Large 3 2512 for coding?

Only GPT-5.2-Codex has a coding score, 45.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Mistral Large 3 2512 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Mistral Large 3 2512 for output tokens 9.3x cheaper ($1.50 vs $14.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2-Codex or Mistral Large 3 2512?

GPT-5.2-Codex costs $1.75 per million input tokens and $14.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 3 2512 costs $0.50 and $1.50. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, GPT-5.2-Codex costs $0.43 and Mistral Large 3 2512 $0.77.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.2-Codex or Mistral Large 3 2512?

GPT-5.2-Codex, with 400K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.2-Codex vs Mistral Large 3 2512 comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-5.2-Codex's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Mistral Large 3 2512's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next