Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) vs GPT-6 Astra Pro

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) costs 5.0x less per output token than GPT-6 Astra Pro ($10.00 vs $50.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
0
GPT-6 Astra ProOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$50.00
1
vs boards won of 1 shared

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) or GPT-6 Astra Pro: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o (2024-11-20) for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($10.00 vs $50.00 per million) and work measured by WeirdML, where it leads.

Shared results
1
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) only
23
GPT-6 Astra Pro only
1
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) not benchmarked, GPT-6 Astra Pro not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 68.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
WeirdML: GPT-4o (2024-11-20) 25.1% against GPT-6 Astra Pro 93.6%, 68.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) $10.00 against GPT-6 Astra Pro $50.00 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) takes 128K tokens, GPT-6 Astra Pro 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o (2024-11-20)BarsGPT-6 Astra ProTies
Coding01
All shared boards01
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-6 Astra Pro
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GPT-6 Astra ProLeader
Aider polyglot18.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)43.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
GSO-Bench0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
WeirdML25.1%93.6%GPT-6 Astra Pro
Cybench12.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-6 Astra Pro
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GPT-6 Astra ProLeader
AA Intelligence Index8.4Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-6 Astra Pro
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GPT-6 Astra ProLeader
TheAgentCompany8.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-6 Astra Pro
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GPT-6 Astra ProLeader
GPQA Diamond53.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)47.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured76.0%Only GPT-6 Astra Pro measured
VPCT40.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-6 Astra Pro
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GPT-6 Astra ProLeader
AIME11.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)74.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
OTIS Mock AIME6.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MATH level 549.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-6 Astra Pro
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GPT-6 Astra ProLeader
MMLU Pro72.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)59.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)45.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)57.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
GeoBench71.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-6 Astra Pro
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GPT-6 Astra ProLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-6 Astra Pro
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GPT-6 Astra ProLeader
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 47 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-6 Astra Pro
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GPT-6 Astra ProLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.0075Fits in one request
GPT-6 Astra Pro$0.035Fits in one request

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.155Fits in one request
GPT-6 Astra Pro$0.650Fits in one request

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.600Exceeds the context window
GPT-6 Astra Pro$2.50Fits in one request

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-6 Astra Pro
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-11-20)OpenAI GPT-6 Astra Pro
MakerOpenAIOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedNovember 20, 2024September 4, 2026
Context window128K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.50$10.00
Output $/Mtok$10.00$50.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o (2024-11-20) better than GPT-6 Astra Pro for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o (2024-11-20) for output tokens 5.0x cheaper ($10.00 vs $50.00 per million) and work measured by WeirdML, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) or GPT-6 Astra Pro?

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; GPT-6 Astra Pro costs $10.00 and $50.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) or GPT-6 Astra Pro?

GPT-6 Astra Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o (2024-11-20) vs GPT-6 Astra Pro comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. GPT-4o (2024-11-20)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GPT-6 Astra Pro's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next