Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini leads GPT-4o (2024-11-20) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 20.4 to 8.4, and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs 5.0x less per output token ($2.00 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
0
GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
1
vs boards won of 1 shared

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) or GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o (2024-11-20) for work measured by AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
1
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) only
23
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini only
21
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) not benchmarked, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 12.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: GPT-4o (2024-11-20) 8.4 against GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini 20.4, 12.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) $10.00 against GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini $2.00 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o (2024-11-20) takes 128K tokens, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini 400K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o (2024-11-20)BarsGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniTies
Intelligence01
All shared boards01
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
Aider polyglot18.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1244Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)43.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.6%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured33.3%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured61.6%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
GSO-Bench0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
WeirdML25.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Cybench12.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1253Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
AA Intelligence Index8.420.4GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured62.9%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
TheAgentCompany8.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
GPQA Diamond53.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)62.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured81.3%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured18.5%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)47.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
VPCT40.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
AIME11.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)74.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
AA Math IndexNot measured91.7Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured91.7%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME6.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MATH level 549.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
MMLU Pro72.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)82.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)59.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)45.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)57.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.0%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
GeoBench71.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1111Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1078Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1092Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1097Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured988Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1093Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured977Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1105Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
IFBenchNot measured67.9%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured66.7%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-11-20) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 43 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-11-20)GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.0075Fits in one request
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.0013Fits in one request

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.155Fits in one request
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.018Fits in one request

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-11-20)$0.600Exceeds the context window
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.070Fits in one request

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o (2024-11-20) and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-11-20)OpenAI GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
MakerOpenAIOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedNovember 20, 2024November 13, 2025
Context window128K400K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.25
Output $/Mtok$10.00$2.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o (2024-11-20) better than GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o (2024-11-20) for work measured by AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) or GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini?

GPT-4o (2024-11-20) costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs $0.25 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o (2024-11-20) or GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini?

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini, with 400K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o (2024-11-20) vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4o (2024-11-20)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next